Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Does Cast Immobilization Contribute To Posterior Stability After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

K. H. Yoon, S. Park, S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Park, H. Oh
Published 2013 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to confirm the contribution of long leg cast immobilization to posterior stability after reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. METHODS Of 84 patients who underwent arthroscopic PCL reconstruction between November 2006 and December 2009, 44 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups and analyzed prospectively. For 22 patients (the cast group), long leg cast immobilization was applied until postoperative week 5 and then a 0° locking brace was worn until week 12. Full weight bearing was allowed immediately after operation. For the other 22 patients (the brace group), only a 0° locking brace was applied until postoperative week 12 without cast immobilization. Range of motion (ROM), clinical scores, Telos device (Telos, Marburg, Germany) posterior stress radiographic assessment results and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grades of both groups were analyzed preoperatively and at postoperative years 1 and 2. RESULTS The mean preoperative side-to-side difference on Telos posterior stress radiographs was 11.3 ± 2.5 mm in the cast group and 12.7 ± 2.1 mm in the brace group, revealing no differences between the 2 groups (P = .743), but postoperatively the mean difference measured 2.5 ± 1.9 mm and 4.8 ± 2.4 mm, respectively, showing a significantly smaller difference in the cast group (P = .004); the improvement was 8.8 mm and 7.9 mm, respectively, and was statistically significant (P = .021). Preoperative IKDC grades were not different between the 2 groups (P > .05), but 2 years postoperatively, the cast group showed a significantly better distribution of grades (P = .012). The mean ROM, Lysholm scores, IKDC subjective scores, and Tegner scores 2 years postoperatively were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS The patients immobilized with long leg casts until 5 weeks after PCL reconstruction showed significantly better results in Telos posterior stress radiographs and distribution of IKDC grades 2 years postoperatively and did not show limited ROM when compared with the patients who wore braces only. However, IKDC subjective scores were not found to be different between the 2 groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I, prospective randomized comparative study.
This paper references
Evaluation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results after treatment with casting and bracing for the acutely injured posterior cruciate ligament.
J. H. Ahn (2011)
Healing of the patellar tendon autograft after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction— a process of ligamentization?
U. Bosch (1992)
Excessive compression of the human tibio-femoral joint causes ACL rupture.
E. G. Meyer (2005)
Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
C. Harner (1998)
Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
J. Sekiya (2005)
Arthroscopic double-bundle augmentation of posterior cruciate ligament using split Achilles allograft.
K. H. Yoon (2005)
Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared.
H. Dejour (1994)
Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Robert B. Kohen (2009)
Effects of Increasing Tibial Slope on the Biomechanics of the Knee
J. Robert Giffin (2004)
Dependence of cruciate-ligament loading on muscle forces and external load.
M. Pandy (1997)
Serial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the patellar tendon after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
P. Mariani (2002)
Cruciate ligament forces in the human knee during rehabilitation exercises.
D. Toutoungi (2000)
Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
W. M. Wind (2004)
Posterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: how slow should we go?
G. Fanelli (2008)
Posterior Cruciate Ligament
J. Voos (2012)
Active non-operative treatment of acute isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury with cylinder cast immobilization
Y. B. Jung (2008)
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Arthroscopic Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Preserving Remnant Fibers
K. H. Yoon (2011)
Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: scientific rationale and surgical technique.
A. Chhabra (2006)
A musculoskeletal model of the knee for evaluating ligament forces during isometric contractions.
K. B. Shelburne (1997)
Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is non-aggressive rehabilitation the right protocol?
B. Quelard (2010)
Current concepts review: the posterior cruciate ligament.
G. Fanelli (2010)
Comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces during open-kinetic-chain and closed-kinetic-chain exercises.
G. Lutz (1993)
Pattern of anterior cruciate ligament force in normal walking.
K. Shelburne (2004)
Biomechanical evaluation of double bundle augmentation of posterior cruciate ligament using finite element analysis.
K. H. Yoon (2010)
Staging of patellar tendon autograft healing after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A biomechanical and histological study in a sheep model.
W. Kasperczyk (1993)
Importance of Tibial Slope for Stability of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament—Deficient Knee
J. Robert Giffin (2007)
Rehabilitation of the multiple-ligament-injured knee.
J. Irrgang (2000)
Anterior positioning of tibia during motion after anterior cruciate ligament injury.
J. Kvist (2001)

This paper is referenced by
Surgical Treatment of Combined PCL/Lateral-Sided Injuries
C. Wahl (2015)
Uso do fixador externo articulado no tratamento cirúrgico da instabilidade multiligamentar crônica do joelho
Roberto Freire da Mota (2015)
The amount of displacement can determine non-operative treatment in posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture
Kyoung Jae Yoon (2020)
Climbing the level of evidence ladder: prospective, comparative-effectiveness knee ACL and PCL research.
J. Lubowitz (2013)
16 – Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Diagnosis, Operative Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes
F. Noyes (2017)
Brace Considerations for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee
E. Crawford (2015)
Brace Considerations in Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Instability and the Multiple-Ligament Injured Knee
E. Crawford (2019)
The Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Versus Open Popliteal Tendon Reconstruction Combined With Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With Type A Posterolateral Rotational Instability.
Y. Li (2019)
Congratulations and condemnations: Level I Evidence prize for femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction, and AAOS clinical practice guidelines miss the mark-again.
J. Lubowitz (2014)
Biomechanical evaluation of a novel dynamic posterior cruciate ligament brace.
C. Heinrichs (2016)
Does surgical reconstruction produce better stability than conservative treatment in the isolated PCL injuries?
Soyeon Ahn (2016)
Quantification of functional brace forces for posterior cruciate ligament injuries on the knee joint: an in vivo investigation
R. LaPrade (2014)
Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: a prospective, randomized study.
Yong-qian Li (2014)
Short report Open Access
H. Mohammadi (2015)
Occupational consequences after isolated reconstruction of the insufficient posterior cruciate ligament
C. Ihle (2013)
Sole vibration improves locomotion through the recovery of joint movements in a mouse cast model
A. Doi (2017)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar