Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

A Meta-analysis Of Continuous Vs Intermittent Infusion Of Loop Diuretics In Hospitalized Patients.

Fahad Al-Qahtani, I. Koulouridis, P. Susantitaphong, Khagendra Dahal, B. Jaber
Published 2014 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
BACKGROUND Several studies have examined the potential benefits of continuous vs intermittent (bolus) intravenous loop diuretic administration in hospitalized patients with conflicting results. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these 2 strategies in hospitalized adults and children with extracellular fluid volume expansion. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (through October 2012) and prior meta-analyses for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of continuous vs intermittent infusion of loop diuretics. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed to examine several outcomes, including net change in urine output and body weight. RESULTS We identified 7 crossover and 11 parallel-arm randomized controlled trials (936 patients) of adults and children. In the 15 studies of adults, continuous loop diuretic infusion resulted in a nonsignificant net increase in daily urine output of 334 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], -74 to 742; P = .11) relative to the bolus infusion. In the 8 studies that used a loading dose, continuous loop diuretic infusion resulted in a significant net increase in daily urine output of 294 mL (95% CI, 31-557; P = .03) relative to the intermittent infusion. There was also a significant net decrease in body weight of 0.78 kg (95% CI, -1.54 to -0.03; P = .04) in the continuous relative to the intermittent loop diuretic infusion. In the 3 studies of children, there was no demonstrable effect on daily urine output or body weight. CONCLUSION Continuous infusion of loop diuretics preceded by a loading dose results in greater diuresis in hospitalized adults with extracellular fluid volume expansion compared with intermittent dosing regimens. Further studies are required to examine whether these benefits translate into improved clinical outcomes.
This paper references
Bumetanide and furosemide in heart failure.
D. Brater (1984)
Continuous versus intermittent infusion of furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure.
Margaret R. Thomson (2010)
High dose frusemide in acute renal failure: a controlled trial.
C. B. Brown (1981)
Diuretic effects of furosemide infusion versus bolus injection in congestive heart failure.
N. Pivac (1998)
Continuous versus bolus dosing of Furosemide for patients hospitalized for heart failure.
L. Allen (2010)
Pharmacodynamics of Torsemide Administered as an Intravenous Injection and as a Continuous Infusion to Patients with Congestive Heart Failure
W. Kramer (1996)
The comparison of the diuretic and natriuretic efficacy of continuous and bolus intravenous furosemide in patients with chronic kidney disease
S. Sanjay (2008)
Comparison of Hemodynamic and Biochemical Effects of Furosemide by Continuous Infusion and Intermittent Bolus in Critically Ill Patients
M. Mojtahedzadeh (2004)
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of furosemide in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized studies
A. Zangrillo (2012)
How Do Loop Diuretics Act?
M. Wittner (2012)
Diuretic efficiency of furosemide in continuous intravenous infusion vs. bolus injection in congestive heart failure: results of a pilot study
J Bagatin (1993)
Effects of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as bolus in refractory congestive heart failure: long-term effects.
G. Licata (2003)
Continuous versus intermittent furosemide infusion in critically ill infants after open heart operations.
G. Luciani (1997)
Loop diuretics for chronic renal insufficiency: a continuous infusion is more efficacious than bolus therapy.
D. W. Rudy (1991)
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
T. Huedo-Medina (2006)
Use of diuretics in renal disease.
P. Steinmetz (1970)
Protocol-guided diuretic management: comparison of furosemide by continuous infusion and intermittent bolus.
D. Schuller (1997)
Comparison of Continuous Versus Intermittent Furosemide Administration in Postoperative Pediatric Cardiac Patients
N. Singh (1992)
Diuresis with continuous infusion of furosemide after cardiac surgery.
J. Copeland (1983)
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure.
D. R. K. Salvador (2004)
Effects of high-dose furosemide and smallvolume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as bolus in refractory congestive heart failure: long-term effects
G Licata (2003)
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.
D. Elbourne (2002)
Effects of high-dose furosemide and smallvolume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as bolus in refractory congestive heart failure: long-term effects
G Licata (2003)
Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus furosemide in ADHF: an updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
M. Amer (2012)
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.
J. Sterne (2001)
Diuretic efficacy of high dose furosemide in severe heart failure: bolus injection versus continuous infusion.
T. Dormans (1996)
Intermittent administration of furosemide versus continuous infusion in the postoperative management of children following open heart surgery
J. Klinge (1997)
Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
R. Dersimonian (1986)
Intermittent administration of furosemide vs continuous infusion preceded by a loading dose for congestive heart failure.
M. Lahav (1992)
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
A. Jadad (1996)
andGilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics
L Brunton (2010)
Role of the funding source
T. Wolff (2007)
Pharmacotherapy of Renal Disease and Hypertension
W. Bennett (1987)
Frusemide Administration in Critically Ill Patients by Continuous Compared to Bolus Therapy
M. Ostermann (2007)
High-dose furosemide for established ARF: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
F. Cantarovich (2004)
The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics
L. Goodman (1941)
How do loop diuretics act? Drugs 1991;41(Suppl 3):1–13
M Wittner (1991)
Furosemide infusion prevents the requirement of renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery.
A. T. Kunt (2009)
Loop diuretics in the management of acute renal failure: a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.
I. Shilliday (1997)
Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
S. Werns (2012)
Effect of bolus injection versus continuous infusion of furosemide on diuresis and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe congestive heart failure.
E. Aaser (1997)
Clinical Pharmacology of Loop Diuretics
D. Brater (2012)
Goodman and Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics
W. Stigelman (1986)

This paper is referenced by
Bolus Injection Versus Infusion of Furosemide in Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
A. Zomorrodi (2017)
Study on Drug Utilization Pattern of Diuretics at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
B. Chitra (2017)
Loop Diuretics in Clinical Practice
Se Won Oh (2015)
Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Bolus Injection of Furosemide in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
K. Ng (2018)
Myocardial dysfunction in relation to serum thiamine levels in children with diabetic ketoacidosis
R. Mohamed (2019)
Patterns of diuretic use in the intensive care unit
I. McCoy (2019)
Clinical Use of Diuretics in Heart Failure, Cirrhosis, and Nephrotic Syndrome
A. H. Qavi (2015)
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Treatment – Specific Therapies
D. Fishbein (2017)
Management of Congestion and Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure
G. Regolisti (2016)
Acute Kidney Injury in Pediatric Heart Failure
A. Riley (2016)
Continuous infusion or bolus injection of loop diuretics for congestive heart failure?
P. Zepeda (2016)
Continuous infusion vs. intermittent bolus injection of furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
K. Ng (2018)
Fluid Management: Pharmacologic and Renal Replacement Therapies
Eric L. Wald (2016)
Urine volume as a predicting factor for furosemide clearance during continuous infusion in AKI septic shock patients on hemodiafiltration
F. Mariano (2018)
In-hospital journey of patients with heart failure
H. Kaya (2015)
Which dosing of furosemide is better in acute decompensated heart failure?
Stephanie Jalaba (2017)
Diagnosis and management of acute heart failure
D. Ural (2015)
Cardiorenal Syndrome in Heart Failure Patients: ICU Management
A. Kowalski (2019)
Complicaciones renales agudas en el paciente crítico
Carolina Larrarte (2016)
Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society 2014 Consensus Statement: Pharmacotherapies in Cardiac Critical Care Fluid Management
Amy N. McCammond (2016)
Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance Study: design and rationale
Z. Cox (2020)
Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Cardiomyopathies in Children
J. Price (2016)
Medical management of pediatric heart failure
Humera Ahmed (2020)
Intermittent furosemide administration in patients with or at risk for acute kidney injury: Meta-analysis of randomized trials
T. Bove (2018)
Misconceptions in acute heart failure diagnosis and Management in the Emergency Department
Brit Long (2018)
Furosemide as a functional marker of acute kidney injury in ICU patients: a new role for an old drug
F. Mariano (2019)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar