Identifying Sincerity Of Effort Based On The Combined Predictive Ability Of Multiple Grip Strength Tests.
B. Sindhu, O. Shechtman, P. Veazie
Published 2012 · Medicine
Download PDFAnalyze on Scholarcy
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort. INTRODUCTION Detecting sincerity of effort (SOE) of grip strength remains a frustrating and elusive task for hand therapists because there are no valid, reliable, or widely accepted assessments for identifying feigned effort. Some therapists use various combinations of different SOE tests in an attempt to identify feigned effort, but there is lack of evidence to support this practice. PURPOSE The present study examined the ability of a combination of three grip strength tests commonly used in the clinic to detect SOE: the five rung grip test, rapid exchange grip test, and coefficient of variation. A secondary purpose was to compare the predictive ability between the logistic and linear regression models. METHODS Healthy participants (n=146) performed the three SOE tests exerting both maximal and submaximal efforts. We compared the ability of two regression models, the logistic and linear models, to predict sincere versus insincere efforts. RESULTS Combining the three tests predicted SOE better than each test alone. Yet, the full logistic model, which was the best predictor of SOE, explained only 42% of variance and correctly classified only 58% of the efforts. CONCLUSIONS Our findings do not support the clinical practice of combining these three tests to detect SOE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Not applicable.
This paper references
Explained Variance in Logistic Regression
A. Demaris (2002)
Categorical Data Analysis
David E. Hapeman (1991)
The administration and interpretation of the rapid exchange grip test: a national survey.
O. Shechtman (2008)
Coefficient of variation in maximal and feigned static and dynamic grip efforts.
Z. Dvir (1999)
The use of the rapid exchange grip test in detecting sincerity of effort, Part I: administration of the test.
C. Taylor (2000)
The coefficient of variation as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength, Part I: the statistical principle.
O. Shechtman (2001)
Nonparametric Model Discrimination in International Relations
K. Clarke (2003)
Using the coefficient of variation to detect sincerity of effort of grip strength: a literature review.
O. Shechtman (2000)
Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective
S. Maxwell (1990)
Variability of grip strength during isometric contraction.
A. H. Fairfax (1995)
MMPI-2 base rates for 492 personal injury plaintiffs: implications and challenges for forensic assessment.
P. Lees-Haley (1997)
Sensitivity and specificity.
R. Berg (2005)
Objective evaluation of grip strength.
D. Janda (1987)
Analysis of approaches to detection of sincerity of effort through grip strength measurement.
P. King (1998)
Detecting submaximal efforts in grip strength testing with the coefficient of variation
M. Robinson (1993)
QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY
T. Amemiya (1981)
THE INJURED UPPER EXTREMITY AND THE JAMAR FIVE‐HANDLE POSITION GRIP TEST
S. Goldman (1991)
Using the Surface Electromyographic Signal to Identify Maximal versus Submaximal Efforts in People with Upper Extremity Injuries
Bhagwant Sindhu (2009)
Rapid Repeat Testing of Grip Strength for Detection of Faked Hand Weakness
M. Tredgett (2000)
The coefficient of variation as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength, Part II: sensitivity and specificity.
O. Shechtman (2001)
Voluntary Control of Submaximal Grip Strength
B. Niebuhr (1990)
Detection of submaximal effort by use of the rapid exchange grip.
D. Hildreth (1989)
Identification of low-effort patients through dynamometry.
H. Stokes (1995)
Effectiveness of the Five–Handle Position Grip Strength Test in Detecting Sincerity of Effort in Men and Women
Z. Gutierrez (2003)
Electromyographic analysis of effort in grip strength assessment.
B. Niebuhr (1993)
Consistency of sincere and feigned grip exertions with repeated testing.
E. Hoffmaster (1993)
Assessing maximum effort in upperextremity functional testing
JW King (1991)
The Detection of Feigned Hand Weakness Using the Five Position Grip Strength Test
M. Tredgett (1999)
Spatial Prediction of Landslide Hazard Using Logistic Regression and ROC Analysis
P. Gorsevski (2006)
Detecting submaximal grip exertions of variable effort by electromyography.
B. Niebuhr (1996)
Using the force-time curve to detect maximal grip strength effort.
O. Shechtman (2007)
Logit Models. From Economics and Other Fields
N. Jonker (2005)
How do therapists administer the rapid exchange grip test? A survey.
O. Shechtman (2002)
Analysis of the statistical methods used to detect submaximal effort with the five-rung grip strength test.
O. Shechtman (2005)
An Introduction to the Bootstrap: 45-82
B. Efron (1993)
The Effect of the Duration of Intertrial Rest Periods on Isometric Grip Strength Performance in Young Adults
Patricia B. Trossman (1989)
Assessing sincerity of effort in maximal grip strength tests.
S. N. Chengalur (1990)
Evaluation of the torque-velocity test of the BTE-Primus as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength.
O. Shechtman (2007)
An evaluation of rapid exchange and simultaneous grip tests.
K. Joughin (1993)
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences
A. Agresti (1979)
Detecting sincerity of effort: a summary of methods and approaches.
D. Lechner (1998)
Towards an objective assessment of the “maximal voluntary contraction” component in routine muscle strength measurements
K. Kroemer (2004)
The use of the coefficient of variation in detecting sincerity of effort: a meta-analysis.
O. Shechtman (2006)
Review of sincerity of effort testing
A. H. Fairfax (1997)
Clinical assessment Recommendations
Elaine Ewing Fess (1981)
The use of the rapid exchange grip test in detecting sincerity of effort, Part II: validity of the test.
O. Shechtman (2000)
A national study of medical care expenditures for musculoskeletal conditions: the impact of health insurance and managed care.
E. Yelin (2001)
The Hand: Diagnosis and Indications
G. Lister (1984)
Using the force-time curve to determine sincerity of effort in people with upper extremity injuries.
Bhagwant Sindhu (2011)
Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants
P. Green (2001)
Detection of submaximal effort with computer-assisted grip strength measurements.
M. Mitterhauser (1997)
Categorical Data Analysis.
D. Lendrem (1991)
Base Rates of Malingering and Symptom Exeggeration
W. Mittenberg (2002)
Estimating the Error Rate of a Prediction Rule: Improvement on Cross-Validation
B. Efron (1983)
Sensitivity of the Jamar Dynamometer in detecting submaximal grip effort.
R. Ashford (1996)
The seriously uninjured hand--weakness of grip.
H. Stokes (1983)
On the Association of Effort and Force of Handgrip
H. Krombholz (1985)
Detecting sincerity of effort when measuring grip strength.
B. Niebuhr (1987)
Is the coefficient of variation a valid measure for detecting sincerity of effort of grip strength?
O. Shechtman (1999)
Measurement of grip strength in the diagnosis of wrist pain.
A. Czitrom (1988)
This paper is referenced by
Extended dynamometry: reference values
H J C R Belcher (2019)
Prediction of lung function using handgrip strength in healthy young adults
Nnamdi C Mgbemena (2019)
Determining Sincerity of Effort Based on Grip Strength Test in Three Wrist Positions
Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh (2018)
Reliability of the grip strength coefficient of variation for detecting sincerity in normal and blocked median nerve in healthy adults.
N. Wachter (2017)
Approaches to the Quantitative Physical and Functional Capacity Assessment of Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders
Samuel M. Bierner (2014)
PREDICTION OF LUNG FUNCTION USING HANDGRIP STRENGTH IN 1 HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS 2 3
Nnamdi C Mgbemena (2019)
Investigation of the relationship between anthropometric measurements and maximal handgrip strength in young adults.
Christopher A Eidson (2017)
Effect of Verbal Directions on Grip Strength Evaluated Using the Handheld Dynamometer
Laura Walsh (2019)
The advantages and disadvantages of using high technology in hand rehabilitation.
Yafi Levanon (2013)
Comparison of the strength endurance parameters for the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment (BTE) Simulator II and the Jamar Handgrip Dynamometer.
Edwin J. Myers (2017)
Influence of Maximal or Submaximal Effort on the Load Distribution of the Hand Analyzed by Manugraphy.
Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor (2018)
Machine learning as a tool for predicting insincere effort in power grips
P. Hahn (2016)