Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Implementing Miscanthus Into Farming Systems: A Review Of Agronomic Practices, Capital And Labour Demand

B. Winkler, Anja Mangold, M. Cossel, J. Clifton-Brown, M. Pogrzeba, I. Lewandowski, Yasir Iqbal, Andreas Kiesel
Published 2020 · Environmental Science

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Abstract Miscanthus is a promising bioeconomy crop with several biomass utilisation pathways. However, its current cultivation area in Europe is relatively low. This is most likely due to a lack of knowledge about the implementation of miscanthus into farming systems. This study reviews current best practices and suitable land areas for miscanthus cultivation. Biomass production costs and labour requirements were evaluated over the whole 20-year cultivation cycle of four utilisation pathways: combustion, animal bedding, and both conventional and organic biogas production. The assessment was performed for two field sizes (1 and 10 ha), two average annual yield levels (15 and 25 t dry matter ha−1), and both green and brown harvest regimes. The maximum attainable annual gross margins are 1657 € ha−1 for combustion, 13,920 € ha−1 for animal bedding, 2066 € ha−1 for conventional and 2088 € ha−1 for organic biogas production. The combustion pathway has the lowest labour demand (141.5 h ha−1), and animal bedding the highest (317.6 h ha−1) due to additional baling during harvest. Suitable cultivation areas include depleted soils, erosion-prone slopes, heavy clay soils and ecological focus areas such as riparian buffer zones and groundwater protection areas. On such sites, miscanthus would (i) improve soil and water quality, and (ii) enable viable agricultural land utilisation even on scattered patches and strips. Due to its low demands and perennial nature, miscanthus is suitable for sustainable intensification of industrial crop cultivation in a growing bioeconomy, benefiting soil and water quality, while providing large amounts of biomass for several utilisation pathways.
This paper references
Yield and quality development comparison between miscanthus and switchgrass over a period of 10 years
Y. Iqbal (2015)
Perennial energy crops vs. durum wheat in low input lands: Economic analysis of a Greek case study
Stamatis Mantziaris (2017)
Trade-off between harvest date and lignocellulosic crop choice for advanced biofuel production in the Mediterranean area
Federica Zanetti (2019)
Harvest Time Optimization for Combustion Quality of Different Miscanthus Genotypes across Europe
Y. Iqbal (2017)
Effect of hydrothermal pretreatment on Miscanthus anaerobic digestion.
X. Zhou (2017)
Nitrogen, energy and land use efficiencies of miscanthus, reed canary grass and triticale as determined by the boundary line approach
I. Lewandowski (2006)
Harvest date and leaf:stem ratio determine methane hectare yield of miscanthus biomass
Anja Mangold (2019)
Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies
S. Cadoux (2012)
Paris: REN21 Secretariat c/o UN Environment
Ren21 (2018)
What is the EU28 energy consumption
European Bioenergy
Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus x giganteus Greef et Deu
J. M. Greef (1993)
Miscanthus as biogas substrate – cutting tolerance and potential for anaerobic digestion
Andreas Kiesel (2017)
Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie
Abteilung Tierische (2009)
Perennial herbaceous crops as a feedstock for energy and industrial purposes: Organic and mineral fertilizers versus biomass yield and efficient nitrogen utilization
M. Stolarski (2017)
Site-adapted production of bioenergy feedstocks on poorly drained cropland through the cultivation of perennial crops. A feasibility study on biomass yield and biochemical methane potential
T. Ruf (2018)
What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly.
V. Cramer (2008)
Produktion von Kosubstraten für die Biogasanlage - ergebnisse der Versuche mit Durchwachsener Silphie (Silphium perfoliatum L.) in Baden-Württemberg
K Stolzenburg (2016)
The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe
I. Lewandowski (2003)
Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design
Benjamin Sovacool (2018)
Miscanthus for biogas production: Influence of harvest date and ensiling on digestibility and methane hectare yield
Anja Mangold (2019)
Suitability of Miscanthus genotypes for lightweight concrete.
R. Pude (2005)
Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production
M. Cossel (2019)
Perennial biomass crops for a resource‐constrained world
M. Jones (2016)
Agrarheute . com . Heu und Stroh : preise brechen alle Rekorde . 2019
N Feldwisch (2011)
Impact of premature harvest of Miscanthus x giganteus for biogas production on organic residues, microbial parameters and earthworm community in soil
T. Ruf (2017)
The Importance of Perennial Grasses as a Feedstock for Bioenergy and Bioproducts
S. Cosentino (2018)
How to Generate Yield in the First Year—A Three-Year Experiment on Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Establishment under Maize (Zea mays L.)
M. Cossel (2019)
Biogas potential from forbs and grass-clover mixture with the application of near infrared spectroscopy.
R. Wahid (2015)
Invertebrate populations in miscanthus (Miscanthus×giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields
T. Semere (2007)
Planting density impact on weed infestation and the yield of Miscanthus grown on two soil types
J. Maksimović (2016)
Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy conversion in cool climates
C. V. Beale (1995)
Joint international workshop on high nature value criteria and potential for sustainable use of degraded lands
K Wiegmann (2008)
Rahmenbedingungen und Strategien für einen an Umweltaspekten ausgerichteten
N Feldwisch (2011)
Miscanthus best practice guidelines. Agriculture and food development authority, teagasc, and agri-food and bioscience institute
B Caslin (2015)
Influences of nitrogen fertilization and harvest time on combustion quality of four perennial grasses in a semi-arid Mediterranean climate
Recep Irfan Nazli (2019)
World Reference Base for Soil Resources
P. Schád (2013)
Progress in upscaling Miscanthus biomass production for the European bio‐economy with seed‐based hybrids
J. Clifton-Brown (2017)
Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production
M. Brandão (2012)
Miscanthus best practice guidelines. Agriculture and food development authority, teagasc, and agri-food and bioscience
B Caslin (2010)
Performance of Miscanthus x giganteus (Greef et Deu) established with plastic mulch and grown from a range of rhizomes sizes and densities in a cool temperate climate
R. Olave (2017)
Progress on Optimizing Miscanthus Biomass Production for the European Bioeconomy: Results of the EU FP7 Project OPTIMISC
I. Lewandowski (2016)
Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK
C. Sherrington (2008)
Site-Specific Management of Miscanthus Genotypes for Combustion and Anaerobic Digestion: A Comparison of Energy Yields
Andreas Kiesel (2017)
To integrate or to segregate food crop and energy crop cultivation at the landscape scale? Perspectives on biodiversity conservation in agriculture in Europe
Jens Dauber (2016)
Produktion von Kosubstraten für die Biogasanlage -ergebnisse der Versuche mit Durchwachsener Silphie (Silphium perfoliatum L
K Stolzenburg (2016)
Zeitreihen zur Entwicklung der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland
Erneuerbare Energien (2019)
Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus � giganteus
JM Greef (1993)
Bio€ okonomische Anwendungs-und Forschugnsfelder bei Miscanthus. Rheinbach: CentMa GmbH
J Muskowitz (2017)
Combustion quality of biomass: practical relevance and experiments to modify the biomass quality of Miscanthus x giganteus
I. Lewandowski (1997)
Zur Theorie und Ermittlung des räumlichen Gleichgewichts der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion
G. Weinschenck (1966)
Inter-annual variation in biomass combustion quality traits over five years in fifteen Miscanthus genotypes in south Germany
Y. Iqbal (2014)
Growth and agronomy of Miscanthus x giganteus for biomass production
E. Anderson (2011)
Novel Miscanthus Germplasm-Based Value Chains: A Life Cycle Assessment
M. Wagner (2017)
Miscanthus Horse Bedding Compares Well to Alternatives
B. Rauscher (2016)
Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy
M. Cossel (2019)
Botanical characteristics, crop management and potential of Silphium perfoliatum L. as a renewable resource for biogas production: a review.
M. Gansberger (2015)
Biogas crops grown in energy crop rotations: Linking chemical composition and methane production characteristics.
C. Herrmann (2016)
Soil carbon stocks in different bioenergy cropping systems including subsoil
Martin Gauder (2016)
Harvest date of Miscanthus x giganteus affects nutrient cycling, biomass development and soil quality
T. Ruf (2017)
Miscanthus – ausführliche Anbaubeschreibung. Straubing: technologieund F€ orderzentrum (TFZ) im Kompetenzzentrum für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe
F. Heintze (2018)
Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus
John Clifton-Brown (2007)
Ground flora, small mammal and bird species diversity in miscanthus (Miscanthus×giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields
T. Semere (2007)
Degraded land and sustainable bioenergy feedstock production. Joint international workshop on high nature value criteria and potential for sustainable use of degraded lands
K Wiegmann (2008)
What is the EU28 energy consumption. 2019
European bioenergy (2019)
Evaluation of Miscanthus sinensis biomass quality as feedstock for conversion into different bioenergy products
T. Weijde (2017)
Effects of thermo-chemical pre-treatment on anaerobic biodegradability and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass.
T. V. Fernandes (2009)
Miscanthus: a fast-growing crop for biofuels and chemicals production
N. Brosse (2012)
The effect of fertilization on yield and quality of Miscanthus sinensis 'Giganteus'.
H. Schwarz (1994)
Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK
Jon P McCalmont (2017)
Miscanthus: A Review of European Experience with a Novel Energy Crop
J. Scurlock (1999)
Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop
I. Lewandowskia
Development of a multi-criteria decision making model for evaluating the energy potential of Miscanthus germplasms for bioenergy production
W. Xiang (2018)
Optimization of specific methane yield prediction models for biogas crops based on lignocellulosic components using non-linear and crop-specific configurations
M. Cossel (2018)
Heu und Stroh: preise brechen alle Rekorde
Economic Aspects of Bioenergy Production from Perennial Grasses in Marginal Lands of South Europe
P. Soldatos (2015)
Soil ecology. Zhytomyr
P Nadtochii (2010)
Erfahrungsbericht Miscanthuseinstreu auf einem Pferdegestüt im Rheinland. Bio€ okonomische Anwendungs- und Forschugnsfelder bei Miscanthus
J. Muskowitz (2017)
Miscanthus as biogas feedstock: influence of harvest time and stand age on the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of two different growing seasons
Axel Schmidt (2018)
Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany
D. Felten (2013)
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World
S. Barth (2016)
Accumulation of Miscanthus-derived carbon in soils in relation to soil depth and duration of land use under commercial farming conditions
D. Felten (2012)
Vielf€ altig nutzbare Dauerkultur. Straubing: technologie- und F€ orderzentrum
A Hartmann (2011)
Economic and environmental performance of miscanthus cultivated on marginal land for biogas production
M. Wagner (2019)
Erosion-preventive crop rotations for landscape ecological stability in upland regions of Lithuania
B. Jankauskas (2003)
Anbau und Verwendung nachwachsender Rohstoffe in Deutschland
Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment
Zhangcai Qin (2018)
Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy
I. Lewandowski (2015)
Mit G€ arresten richtig Düngen: aktuelle Informationen für Berater
K M€ oller (2009)
Combining choice modeling estimates and stochastic simulations to assess the potential of new crops—The case of lignocellulosic perennials in Southwestern Germany
Caroline Sophie-Theresia Gillich (2019)
Miscanthus: anbau und Nutzung - informationen für die Praxis -. Straubing: technologie- und F€ orderzentrum im Kompetenzzentrum für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe
M Fritz (2009)
Vielf€ altig nutzbare Dauerkultur. Straubing: technologie-und F€ orderzentrum. TFZ)
A Hartmann (2011)
‘Collar propagation’ as an alternative propagation method for rhizomatous miscanthus
Anja Mangold (2018)
BMWi -federal Ministry for economic affairs and energy -act on the development of renewable energy sources
Bmwi Mindestlohn: das sind die Folgen für Landwirte
B. Winkler (2019)
Land‐use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon
A. Don (2012)
Long-Term Yields of Switchgrass, Giant Reed, and Miscanthus in the Mediterranean Basin
E. Alexopoulou (2015)
Assessment of the production potentials of Miscanthus on marginal land in China
Shuai Xue (2016)
Den richtigen Preis für Energiesubstrat finden
Introducing Miscanthus to the greening measures of the EU Common Agricultural Policy
C. Emmerling (2017)
Straubing: technologieund F€ orderzentrum (TFZ) im Kompetenzzentrum für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe
F Heintze (2018)
Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production - a review.
C. Witzel (2016)
Miscanthus × giganteus and Arundo donax shoot and rhizome tolerance of extreme moisture stress
J. Jeremiah Mann (2013)
Methane yield potential of novel perennial biogas crops influenced by harvest date
B. Mast (2014)
A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: A case study of perennial biomass crops
A. Haughton (2009)
Feasibility of Miscanthus as alternative bedding for dairy cows
S. Weyenberg (2016)
Methane yield and species diversity dynamics of perennial wild plant mixtures established alone, under cover crop maize (Zea mays L.), and after spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
M. Cossel (2019)
The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview
K. Mccormick (2013)
Accelerating early growth in miscanthus with the application of plastic mulch film
J. O'Loughlin (2017)
Soil Erosion Mitigation by Perennial Species Under Mediterranean Environment
S. Cosentino (2015)
Energy balances and greenhouse gasmitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and B
D Felten (2020)
The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 2003;25:335–61
I Lewandowski (2003)
The early growth and fall frost damage of poplar clones in Latvia.
D. Lazdiņa (2016)
How can miscanthus fields be reintegrated into a crop rotation?
Anja Mangold (2019)
Ground flora, small mammal and bird species diversity in miscanthus (Miscanthus$\times$ giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields. Biomass Bioenergy 2007;31:20–9
T Semere (2007)
How can miscanthus fields be re-integrated into a crop rotation? GCB Bioenergy 2019;11:1348–60
A Mangold (2019)
Perennial grasses for bioenergy and bioproducts: production, uses, sustainability and markets for giant reed, miscanthus, switchgrass, reed canary grass and bamboo
I Lewandowski (2018)
Rhizome und Kosten 2019
Sieverdingbeck Agrar (2019)

This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar