Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Waddell Non-organic Signs: New Evidence Suggests Somatic Amplification Among Outpatient Chronic Pain Patients.

Dustin B. Wygant, Paul A. Arbisi, Kevin J. Bianchini, Robert L. Umlauf
Published 2017 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Waddell et al. identified a set of eight non-organic signs in 1980. There has been controversy about their meaning, particularly with respect to their use as validity indicators. PURPOSE The current study examined the Waddell signs in relation to measures of somatic amplification or over-reporting in a sample of outpatient chronic pain patients. We examined the degree to which these signs were associated with measures of over-reporting. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study examined scores on the Waddell signs in relation to over-reporting indicators in an outpatient chronic pain sample. PATIENT SAMPLE We examined 230 chronic pain patients treated at a multidisciplinary pain clinic. The majority of these patients presented with primary back or spinal injuries. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measures used in the study were Waddell signs, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form. METHODS We examined Waddell signs using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA), receiver operating characteristic analysis, classification accuracy, and relative risk ratios. RESULTS Multivariate analysis of variance and ANOVA showed a significant association between Waddell signs and somatic amplification. Classification analyses showed increased odds of somatic amplification at a Waddell score of 2 or 3. CONCLUSIONS Our results found significant evidence of an association between Waddell signs and somatic over-reporting. Elevated scores on the Waddell signs (particularly scores higher than 2 and 3) were associated with increased odds of exhibiting somatic over-reporting.
This paper references
Association of the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Validity Scales with Structured Malingering Criteria
Dustin B. Wygant (2011)
Waddell signs: distributional properties and correlates.
D. Novy (1998)
Utility of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting non-credible somatic complaints
M. Sellbom (2012)
Is it malingering, or is it 'real'? Eight signs that point to nonorganic back pain.
P. Kiester (1999)
Can brief measures effectively screen for pain and somatic malingering? Examination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and Pain Disability Index.
Adam H Crighton (2014)
Is There a Relationship Between Nonorganic Physical Findings (Waddell Signs) and Secondary Gain/Malingering?
D. Fishbain (2004)
Preliminary Validity Study of the Pain Disability Index
C. A. Pollard (1984)
Nonorganic Physical Signs in Low-Back Pain
Gordon Waddell (1980)
A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs.
D. Fishbain (2003)
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
F. Faul (2007)
Accuracy of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and Pain Disability Index in the Detection of Malingered Pain-Related Disability in Chronic Pain
K. Bianchini (2014)
MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring
S. Hathaway (1989)
On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: lessons from cognitive malingering research.
K. Bianchini (2005)
Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: findings from simulation and known group samples.
Dustin B. Wygant (2009)
The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ).
C. Main (1983)
Exaggerated MMPI-2 symptom report in personal injury litigants with malingered neurocognitive deficit.
G. Larrabee (2003)
The Impact of Patients with Nonorganic Physical Findings on a Controlled Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Electroacupuncture
T. Lehmann (1983)
Detecting submaximal efforts in grip strength testing with the coefficient of variation
M. Robinson (2005)
Framing the Results: Assessment of Response Bias Through Select Self-Report Measures in Psychological Injury Evaluations
Chelsea E Sleep (2015)
MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-Restructured Form Validity Scales: Complementary Approaches to Evaluate Response Validity
J. Hoelzle (2012)

This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar