Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Personalized Mailed Feedback For College Drinking Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

M. Larimer, C. Lee, J. Kilmer, P. Fabiano, C. Stark, I. Geisner, Kimberly A Mallett, T. Lostutter, J. M. Cronce, Maggie A Feeney, C. Neighbors
Published 2007 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
The current study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a mailed feedback and tips intervention as a universal prevention strategy for college drinking. Participants (N = 1,488) were randomly assigned to feedback or assessment-only control conditions. Results indicated that the mailed feedback intervention had a preventive effect on drinking rates overall, with participants in the feedback condition consuming less alcohol at follow-up in comparison with controls. In addition, abstainers in the feedback condition were twice as likely to remain abstinent from alcohol at follow-up in comparison with control participants (odds ratio = 2.02), and feedback participants were significantly more likely to refrain from heavy episodic drinking (odds ratio = 1.43). Neither gender nor severity of baseline drinking moderated the efficacy of the intervention in these analyses, but more conservative analyses utilizing last-observation carryforward suggested women and abstainers benefited more from this prevention approach. Protective behaviors mediated intervention efficacy, with participants who received the intervention being more likely to use strategies such as setting limits and alternating alcohol with nonalcoholic beverages. Implications of these findings for universal prevention of college drinking are discussed.
This paper references
Preventing alcohol abuse in college students: A harm-reduction approach.
G. Marlatt (1995)
10.2105/AJPH.91.8.1310
Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history.
J. Baer (2001)
10.1097/01.ALC.0000113418.12889.08
Approaches to brief intervention for hazardous drinking in young people.
J. Saunders (2004)
10.2190/XD56-D6WR-7195-EAL3
Effects of Normative Feedback on Consumption among Heavy Drinking College Students
G. Agostinelli (1995)
10.1093/ALCALC/AGG107
Incentives to increase participation in an Internet survey of alcohol use: a controlled experiment.
K. Kypri (2003)
Erratum: Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993-2001 (Journal of American College Health (2002) 50:5 (203-217))
H. Wechsler (2002)
10.15288/JSA.2002.63.755
Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail.
S. McCabe (2002)
Gender differences in collegiate risk factors for heavy episodic drinking.
S. McCabe (2002)
10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00231-3
A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice.
D. Simpson (2002)
10.1037/1064-1297.6.1.64
Expectancy challenge and drinking reduction: process and structure in the alcohol expectancy network.
J. Darkes (1998)
10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00239-8
Transporting a research-based adolescent drug treatment into practice.
H. Liddle (2002)
10.15288/JSA.1991.52.580
Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.
J. Baer (1991)
10.2190/JHML-0JPD-YE7L-14CT
Reducing Alcohol Use in College Students: A Controlled Trial of Two Brief Interventions
S. Walters (2000)
10.1007/978-1-4613-2191-0
Treating Addictive Behaviors
W. Miller (1986)
10.1016/S0740-5472(00)00101-X
Drinking on campus. What Do we know about reducing alcohol use among college students?
S. Walters (2000)
The CORE alcohol and drug survey user's manual
C H Presley (1998)
10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.728
Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.
B. Borsari (2000)
10.15288/JSA.1989.50.30
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.
H. White (1989)
10.15288/JSAS.2002.S14.164
Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts.
H. W. Perkins (2002)
10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1038
Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.
K. Fromme (2004)
10.1037/0893-164X.16.1.56
Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?
Elizabeth T. Miller (2002)
Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A Harm Reduction Approach
L. Dimeff (1999)
10.1177/002204260503500210
College Student Drug Prevention: A Review of Individually-Oriented Prevention Strategies
M. Larimer (2005)
10.1097/01.ALC.0000121654.99277.26
Assessment of nonresponse bias in an internet survey of alcohol use.
K. Kypri (2004)
10.1006/PMED.1995.1057
Recruitment to a university alcohol program: evaluation of social marketing theory and stepped approach model.
J. Gries (1995)
Reflections on social norms marketing
W. DeJong (2001)
10.1037/0893-164X.18.4.390
Protective behavioral strategies when drinking alcohol and their relationship to negative alcohol-related consequences in college students.
M. Martens (2004)
10.1176/ajp.155.7.987
Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research
K. E. Blair (1998)
10.7326/0003-4819-122-7-199504010-00033
Reviews and Notes: Psychosocial Medicine: Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research
P. Mrazek (1995)
10.1111/J.1530-0277.1998.TB03925.X
Screening for alcoholism among medical inpatients: how important is corroboration of patient self-report?
S. Chermack (1998)
10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
R. M. Baron (1986)
10.1016/J.ADDBEH.2004.12.005
Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?
S. Walters (2005)
10.2190/4HEY-VWXL-DVR3-HAKV
Comparison of Web and Mail Surveys in Collecting Illicit Drug Use Data: A Randomized Experiment
S. McCabe (2004)
10.15288/JSA.2006.67.309
Evaluating two brief substance-use interventions for mandated college students.
H. White (2006)
10.1007/978-1-4613-2191-0_1
Toward a Comprehensive Model of Change
J. Prochaska (1986)
10.1080/07448480209595713
Trends in College Binge Drinking During a Period of Increased Prevention Efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001
H. Wechsler (2002)
10.15288/JSA.2005.66.479
The utility of collateral informant assessment in college alcohol research: results from a longitudinal prevention trial.
R. Laforge (2005)
10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189
Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol.
R. L. Collins (1985)
10.1016/J.ADDBEH.2005.06.002
Feasibility of an email-based electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) to college students in Sweden.
P. Bendtsen (2006)
10.5993/AJHB.29.4.6
The role of sex-specific normative beliefs in undergraduate alcohol use.
D. Thombs (2005)
10.3998/2027.42/150622
Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-1999. Volume I: Secondary School Students.
L. Johnston (2000)
10.1037/0022-006X.58.6.805
Secondary prevention with college drinkers: evaluation of an alcohol skills training program.
D. Kivlahan (1990)
10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.55.090902.142040
Survey research and societal change.
R. Tourangeau (2004)
10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.571
Being controlled by normative influences: self-determination as a moderator of a normative feedback alcohol intervention.
C. Neighbors (2006)
10.1037/0893-164X.15.4.373
Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.
J. Murphy (2001)
10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.434
Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention.
C. Neighbors (2004)
10.1176/FOC.1.2.213
Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2004.
L. Johnston (2000)
10.1037/1064-1297.4.2.209
Empirical modeling of an alcohol expectancy memory network in elementary school children as a function of grade.
M. Dunn (1996)
10.15288/JSA.2002.63.559
Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.
S. Collins (2002)
10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00028-3
Self-report among injecting drug users: a review.
S. Darke (1998)
National College Health Assessment 2000 user’s manual
American College Health Association. (2000)
10.1037/002819
Alcohol Problems Among Adolescents.
D. McCarthy (1996)
10.1037/0022-006X.66.4.604
Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.
G. Marlatt (1998)
10.15288/JSA.1995.56.383
Self-reported drinking and alcohol-related problems among early adolescents: dimensionality and validity over 24 months.
G. Smith (1995)
10.15288/JSAS.2002.S14.148
Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students.
M. Larimer (2002)
The CORE alcohol and drug survey user’s manual, (6th Ed.)
C. H. Presley (1998)
Reflections on social norms marketing. Catalyst, 6
W Dejong (2001)
10.15288/JSA.2000.61.55
Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials.
T. Babor (2000)
10.15288/JSA.2001.62.370
Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities.
M. Larimer (2001)
Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2004. Vol. 2: College students and adults ages
L. D. Johnston (2005)
Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from four Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys
H Wechsler (1993)
10.15288/JSA.2004.65.200
A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.
J. Murphy (2004)



This paper is referenced by
10.1007/s10935-013-0337-9
Personalized Feedback as a Universal Prevention Approach for College Drinking: A Randomized Trial of an e-Mail Linked Universal Web-Based Alcohol Intervention
T. Palfai (2013)
10.15288/JSAD.2013.74.84
Patterns of alcohol use and related consequences in non-college-attending emerging adults.
M. Cleveland (2013)
10.1353/csd.2013.0081
An Examination of College Students’ Receptiveness to Alcohol-Related Information and Advice
Matthew Michael Leahy (2013)
10.1037/a0023797
Use of protective behavioral strategies and their association to 21st birthday alcohol consumption and related negative consequences: a between- and within-person evaluation.
Melissa A. Lewis (2012)
10.1080/10826084.2016.1271985
College-Related Alcohol Beliefs and Problematic Alcohol Consumption: Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies as a Mediator
Adrian J. Bravo (2017)
10.1037/a0034471
Testing measurement invariance of the protective behavioral strategies scale in college men and women.
H. Treloar (2014)
10.1037/a0021494
An examination of college students' willingness to experience consequences as a unique predictor of alcohol problems.
Kimberly A Mallett (2011)
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.04.020
Changes in protective behavioral strategies and alcohol use among college students.
M. Martens (2011)
10.1037/pas0000235
The Valued Living Questionnaire for Alcohol Use: Measuring value-behavior discrepancy in college student drinking.
M. Miller (2016)
The Impact of Protective Behavioral Strategies: On the Relationship Between the Negative Consequences of Alcohol Use and Anxiety Sensitivity
J. Lambrecht (2012)
10.3109/10826084.2016.1152495
Do Protective Behavioral Strategies Mediate the Effect of Preparty Motives on Event-Level Preparty Alcohol Use?
K. Montes (2016)
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.009
Efficacy of brief motivational intervention in reducing binge drinking in young men: A randomized controlled trial.
J. Daeppen (2011)
10.1080/10410236.2011.585450
Increasing the Effectiveness of Messages Promoting Responsible Undergraduate Drinking: Tailoring to Personality and Matching to Context
Valerie K. York (2012)
10.1016/j.jsat.2010.07.001
Substance use patterns among first-year college students: secondary effects of a combined alcohol intervention.
Joel R. Grossbard (2010)
10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.12.013
Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: gender and race differences.
J. Labrie (2011)
10.1007/s11121-012-0356-4
Optimizing Timing and Dosage: Does Parent Type Moderate the Effects of Variations of a Parent-Based Intervention to Reduce College Student Drinking?
Lindsey Varvil-Weld (2012)
10.1093/alcalc/agn055
Cross-Cultural Patterns in College Student Drinking and its Consequences—A Comparison between the USA and Sweden
Henriettæ Ståhlbrandt (2008)
10.1371/journal.pone.0144146
Internet-Based Brief Intervention to Prevent Unhealthy Alcohol Use among Young Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial
N. Bertholet (2015)
10.1037/13750-004
Psychotherapies for addiction: Empirically supported interventions for the addiction syndrome.
K. Witkiewitz (2012)
10.1186/s13722-016-0055-8
Study protocol for a web-based personalized normative feedback alcohol intervention for young adult veterans
E. Pedersen (2016)
10.1016/J.ADDBEH.2007.04.014
Evaluating personal alcohol feedback as a selective prevention for college students with depressed mood.
I. Geisner (2007)
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.043
Distinguishing subpopulations of marijuana users with latent profile analysis.
M. Pearson (2017)
10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01192.x
Age of drinking onset as a moderator of the efficacy of parent-based, brief motivational, and combined intervention approaches to reduce drinking and consequences among college students.
Kimberly A Mallett (2010)
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Treatment Self-regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) for Assessing Motivations for Responsible Drinking
Dylan K. Richards (2018)
10.1111/J.1559-1816.2011.00860.X
Do Parents Know Best? Examining the Relationship Between Parenting Profiles, Prevention Efforts, and Peak Drinking in College Students.
Kimberly A Mallett (2011)
10.1037/pas0000071
The Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20: improved content validity of the Serious Harm Reduction subscale.
H. Treloar (2015)
10.1111/acer.12714
Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.
David Huh (2015)
10.1177/0047237918800505
Protective Behavioral Strategies and Hazardous Drinking Among College Students: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distress
Hallie R. Jordan (2018)
10.15288/JSAD.2009.70.555
A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students.
R. Turrisi (2009)
10.1037/a0020766
Efficacy of web-based personalized normative feedback: a two-year randomized controlled trial.
C. Neighbors (2010)
10.3109/14659891.2015.1096621
First- and second-hand consequences of alcohol in college: differential associations with later alcohol use
Caitlin C. Abar (2016)
10.1111/acer.14237
Growth Mindsets of Alcoholism Buffer Against Deleterious Effects of Drinking Identity on Problem Drinking Over Time.
K. Lindgren (2019)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar