Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Perseverance In Self-perception And Social Perception: Biased Attributional Processes In The Debriefing Paradigm.

L. Ross, M. Lepper, M. Hubbard
Published 1975 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Two experiments demonstrated that self-perceptions and social perceptions may persevere after the initial basis for such perceptions has been completely discredited. In both studies subjects first received false feedback, indicating that they had either succeeded or failed on a novel discrimination task and then were thoroughly debriefed concerning the predetermined and random nature of this outcome manipulation. In experiment 2, both the initial outcome manipulation and subsequent debriefing were watched and overheard by observers. Both actors and observers showed substantial perseverance of initial impressions concerning the actors' performance and abilities following a standard "outcome" debriefing. "Process" debriefing, in which explicit discussion of the perseverance process was provided, generally proved sufficient to eliminate erroneous self-perceptions. Biased attribution processes that might underlie perserverance phenomena and the implications of the present data for the ethical conduct of deception research are discussed.



This paper is referenced by
Effects of Advertising on Product Risk Perception and Warning Effectiveness
V. Conzola (2003)
10.1002/MAR.1026
A conceptual framework for analyzing deception and debriefing effects in marketing research
D. Toy (2001)
10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.979
Validity and utility of the attributional style construct at a moderate level of specificity.
C. A. Anderson (1988)
10.1016/S0270-4013(08)18012-6
Employment and retirement concerns for persons with developmental disabilities
Amanda Dykema-Engblade (2008)
10.1017/S0140525X00057940
The controversy about irrationality
L. J. Cohen (1983)
10.1007/BF01175352
Disabusing negative self-efficacy expectations via experience, feedback, and discrediting
C. Newman (2005)
10.1037/H0077720
Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information
C. A. Anderson (1980)
10.1037/0022-3514.35.10.734
Facilitation of ego-biased attributions by means of self-serving observer feedback.
Fiore Sicoly (1977)
10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.28
Us and them: Mood effects on intergroup discrimination.
J. Forgas (1996)
10.1111/j.1571-9979.1991.tb00634.x
Barriers to Conflict Resolution
L. Ross (1995)
10.1017/XPS.2014.22
Displacing Misinformation about Events: An Experimental Test of Causal Corrections
B. Nyhan (2015)
10.1162/jocn.2011.21637
Can Innate, Modular “Foundations” Explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory
Christopher L. Suhler (2011)
10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
A model of dual attitudes.
T. Wilson (2000)
10.2139/SSRN.3444228
Can Prompting Investors to be in a Deliberative Mindset Reduce Their Reliance on Fake News
Stephanie M. Grant (2020)
Helping Students Ask Effective Questions about Scientific Claims: Navigating the "Sound Bite" Environment.
Sarah K. Brem (2000)
Relationship Between Race, Gender, and Elder Abuse Awareness
James Earl Burrell (2019)
10.31274/etd-180810-6051
Belief perseverance: The staying power of confession evidence
Curt More (2018)
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.07.001
Causal imprinting in causal structure learning
E. Taylor (2012)
An examination of methods of improving audit judgment
J. Chung (1997)
10.31274/RTD-180813-49
Using counterfactuals to assess eyewitnesses' abilities to estimate the effects of external influences on their lineup identifications
Steve D Charman (2006)
10.2466/pr0.1994.74.3.803
Younger Supervisor-Older Subordinate Dyads: A Relationship of Cooperation or Resistance?
W. J. Smith (1994)
Information and Electoral Attitudes: A Case of Judgment Under Uncertainty
S. Ansolabehere (1993)
10.1007/BF02228036
Use of current situational information and causal inference: Do dysphoric individuals make “unwarranted” causal inferences?
Laura J. Haack (2005)
10.1111/J.1559-1816.1997.TB01614.X
How Disadvantaged Group Members Cope With Discrimination When They Perceive That Social Support Is Available1
K. Ruggiero (1997)
10.1017/S0140525X00080614
Conscious and unconscious representation of aspectual shape in cognitive science
G. Underwood (1990)
10.1111/J.1559-1816.1990.TB01475.X
Toward an Understanding of “The Sex Game”: The Effects of Gender and Self‐Monitoring on Perceptions of Sexuality and Likability in Initial Interactions1
Richard J. Harnish (1990)
10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.193
Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments.
Klaus Fiedler (1996)
"How Bad Does It Have to Get?" How the Ideology of the American Dream Persists in an Era of Economic Insecurity.
J. Wiederspan (2017)
Brady, Trust, and Error
Samuel R. Wiseman (2011)
Talking It Out With Others vs. Deliberation Within and the Law of Group Polarization: Some Implications of the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning for Deliberative Democracy
Hélène Landemore (2012)
10.1177/1365712719894007
Judicial decisions, intellectual virtues and the division of labour
Leandro De Brasi (2020)
10.1037/0278-6133.27.4.445
The role of sexual arousal and sexual partner characteristics in HIV+ MSM's intentions to engage in unprotected sexual intercourse.
P. Shuper (2008)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar