Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Assessing Normal And Abnormal Personality Functioning: Strengths And Weaknesses Of Self-Report, Observer, And Performance-Based Methods

R. Ganellen
Published 2007 · Psychology, Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy Visualize in Litmaps
Share
Reduce the time it takes to create your bibliography by a factor of 10 by using the world’s favourite reference manager
Time to take this seriously.
Get Citationsy
Assessing personality characteristics; distinguishing the boundaries between normal and abnormal functioning; identifying impairment in the domains of work, interpersonal relationships, and emotional state due to maladaptive personality traits; and translating these findings into effective, appropriate treatment interventions is a complicated endeavor. Valid, reliable conclusions about an individual's personality functioning and adjustment cannot be reached unless one has accurate information about that person's patterns of behavior, cognitions, emotions, and interpersonal relationships. I discuss strengths and weaknesses of assessment approaches utilizing explicit assessment methods, such as self-report measures and clinical interviews; information obtained from knowledgeable observers; and performance-based, implicit assessment methods such as the Rorschach Comprehensive System (Exner, 2003). In contrast to explicit methods of assessment, implicit methods can provide salient information about a personality construct whether or not individuals have accurately conceptualized that construct, have weighed how the construct describes them, are self-aware, and are willing to openly provide information relevant to that construct. I propose that the accuracy of conclusions about an individual's personality style, problems in adjustment, and treatment needs may be improved if conclusion are based on a multimethod assessment approach that incorporates information gathered using explicit assessment methods, information provided by significant others, and data from performance-based or implicit measures of personality.
This paper references
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1926.tb40160.x
THE PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC
J. Macpherson (1926)
10.4135/9781412952644.n455
The thematic apperception test.
H. Freed (1946)
Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.
D. Wechsler (1955)
10.1016/B978-1-4832-0087-3.50014-0
CHAPTER 10 – The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
P. Britton (1966)
10.1037/H0020999
Obesity, level of aspiration, and Rorschach and TAT measures of oral dependence.
J. Masling (1967)
10.1002/9781119311263.ch12
The Rorschach : a comprehensive system
J. Exner (1974)
10.1207/S15327752JPA4106_6
A measure of interpersonal dependency.
R. Hirschfeld (1977)
10.1016/0010-440X(83)90032-9
Psychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary?
R. Spitzer (1983)
Assessment of DSM-III personality disorders: the importance of interviewing an informant.
M. Zimmerman (1986)
10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213
Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity.
T. Achenbach (1987)
Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and 1991 profile
T M Achenbach (1987)
10.5014/AJOT.42.10.683B
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.)
M. Drake (1988)
10.1001/ARCHPSYC.1988.01800320045005
Diagnosing personality disorder in depressed patients. A comparison of patient and informant interviews.
M. Zimmerman (1988)
10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.97
Psychosocial functioning and depression: distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences.
P. Barnett (1988)
Personaliity Disorder Examination (PDE) manual
A. W. Loranger (1988)
MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring
S. Hathaway (1989)
10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690
How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?.
D. Mcclelland (1989)
Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile
T. M. Achenbach (1991)
Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry
T. M. Achenbach (1991)
September). Interstudy rater variance: A major problem in diagnosing personality disorders
M. Zimmerman (1993)
10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.336
Time Spent with Child and Parental Agreement about Preschool Children's Behavior
H. Fitzgerald (1994)
10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.362
Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality
P. Costa (1994)
10.1001/ARCHPSYC.1994.03950030061006
Diagnosing personality disorders. A review of issues and research methods.
M. Zimmerman (1994)
10.1176/AJP.151.4.568
Concordance between patients and informants on the personality disorder examination.
L. Riso (1994)
10.5860/choice.33-1827
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed.
Dc Washington (1994)
10.1207/S15327752JPA6302_14
Face Validity and Fakability of Objective and Projective Measures of Dependency
R. Bornstein (1994)
Manual for the MCMI–III
T. Millon (1994)
10.1521/PEDI.1995.9.2.83
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II): I. Description.
M. First (1995)
10.1037/1040-3590.8.2.200
Construct validity of the Rorschach Oral Dependency Scale: 1967–1995.
R. Bornstein (1996)
10.4324/9780203726419
Integrating the Rorschach and the MMPI-2 in Personality Assessment
R. Ganellen (1996)
10.4135/9781412952644.n283
腰痛疾患患者に対するミネソタ多面的人格目録 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) による治療方法の選択
土居 隆 (1996)
10.1521/PEDI.1997.11.2.158
Assessing axis II disorders by informant interview.
D. Bernstein (1997)
10.1521/PEDI.1997.11.2.123
Family history assessment of personality disorders: I. Concordance with direct interview and between pairs of informants.
T. Ferro (1997)
10.1521/PEDI.1998.12.2.149
Patient-informant concordance on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II).
L. Dreessen (1998)
10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.778
Implicit and self-attributed dependency strivings: differential relationships to laboratory and field measures of help seeking.
R. Bornstein (1998)
Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology.
L. Clark (1999)
10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70150-7
Psychopharmacology of borderline personality disorder.
P. Soloff (2000)
Psychopharmacology of borderline personality disorder. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America
P H Soloff (2000)
Combining medication with psychotherapy in the treatment of personality disorders
G. O. Gabbard (2000)
10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128
Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues.
G. Meyer (2001)
Personality disorder interview IV: A semistructured interview for the asseessment of personality disorders
S. Juni (2001)
10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_9
Predicting DSM-IV Cluster B Personality Disorder Criteria From MMPI-2 and Rorschach Data: A Test of Incremental Validity
M. Blais (2001)
10.1176/appi.books.9780890423363.54853
Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Psychiatric Association.
(2001)
10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.472
Whither the Rorschach? An analysis of the evidence.
J. Hunsley (2001)
10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.486
The hard science of Rorschach research: what do we know and where do we go?
G. Meyer (2001)
10.1207/S15327752JPA7602_13
The Rorschach Suicide Constellation: Assessing Various Degrees of Lethality
J. C. Fowler (2001)
10.1037/10423-000
Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality, 2nd ed.
P. Costa (2002)
10.1037//1040-3590.14.4.379
Concordance of self- and informant ratings of adults' current and childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms.
Marla S. Zucker (2002)
10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.39
Correspondence of psychiatric patient and informant ratings of personality traits, temperament, and interpersonal problems.
R. Ready (2002)
10.1177/1073191102238157
Psychiatric Patient– and Informant-Reported Personality
R. Ready (2002)
10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.216
Patients' versus informants' reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1/2-year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders.
D. Klein (2003)
The Rorschach: A comprehensive system: Vol. 1: Basic foundations (4th ed.)
J. E. Exner (2003)
10.1037//1040-3590.11.3.278
A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Rorschach and MMPI Validity
J. B. Hiller (2004)
Rorschach contributions to assessment of suicide risk
R. J. Ganellen (2004)
10.1176/FOC.3.3.396
Guideline Watch: Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder
J. Oldham (2005)
10.1521/PEDI.19.2.110.62628
Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground.
T. Widiger (2005)
10.1521/PEDI.2005.19.3.283
Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology.
R. Verheul (2005)
10.1521/PEDI.2005.19.4.400
Self- and other-reports of traits from the five-factor model: relations to personality disorder.
J. Miller (2005)
10.1521/PEDI.2005.19.3.315
Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-V.
T. Widiger (2005)
10.4324/9781410615640
Rorschach assessment of the personality disorders
S. Huprich (2006)
10.1093/CLIPSY.9.3.300
Informant‐Reports of Personality Disorder: Relation to Self‐Reports and Future Research Directions
E. D. Klonsky (2006)
10.3928/00485713-20060501-06
Integrated Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder
J. Oldham (2006)
Clinical utility of the Rorschach Inkblot Method in the assessment of personality disorders
S. Huprich (2006)
Rorschach assessment of normal and abnormal personality
R. J. Ganellen (2006)
Email: r-ganellen@northwestern
Interstudy rater variance: A major problem in diagnosing personality disorders
M Zimmerman



This paper is referenced by
10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648427
The Construct Validity of the ICD-11 Severity of Personality Dysfunction Under Scrutiny of Object-Relations Theory
Amin Nazari (2021)
10.3389/fpsyt.2021.617702
Assessment of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity in Forensic Patients Using the Semi-structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1): Preliminary Findings
J. Hutsebaut (2021)
10.21500/20112084.4737
The Clinics of Work: An Alternative Vision of Occupational Health
Johnny Javier Orejuela (2020)
10.1093/workar/waaa002
Is Work and Aging Research a Science of Questionnaires? Moving the Field Forward by Considering Perceived Versus Actual Behaviors
Fabiola H Gerpott (2020)
10.1002/cpp.2460
Examining the Relationship Between Object Relations and Interpersonal Distress in a Clinical Sample.
Lylli A Cain (2020)
10.1007/s11920-020-1133-x
Personality Disorders in Older Adults: a Review of Epidemiology, Assessment, and Treatment
K. Penders (2020)
10.1080/09593985.2020.1790067
Development of the Body-Relatedness Observation Scale: A feasibility study.
H. Kalisvaart (2020)
10.1080/00223891.2019.1625909
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Self-Report and Performance-Based Assessment of Object Relations
Rachel A Pad (2019)
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.059
Implicitly and explicitly assessed anxiety: No relationships with recognition of and brain response to facial emotions
T. Suslow (2019)
Multimethod Assessment of Interpersonal Dysfunction using the Rorschach and the MMPI-2-RF
R. Daniels (2019)
10.1093/rheumatology/kez403
A biopsychosocial network model of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
R. Geenen (2019)
10.1016/J.JPSYCHORES.2019.03.057
Development of the body-relatedness observation scale: A feasibility study
H. Kalisvaart (2019)
10.1080/00223891.2018.1546713
The Roberts–2: Italian Validation on a Sample of Children and Adolescents
L. Parolin (2019)
10.4236/OJPSYCH.2018.81001
Associations between the Rorschach Ego Impairment Index and Measures on Intrapsychic and Interpersonal Functioning
J. Stenius (2018)
10.1186/s40561-018-0078-6
Implicit modeling of learners’ personalities in a game-based learning environment using their gaming behaviors
Mouna Denden (2018)
10.1037/ccp0000304
The Agreement Between Clients’ and Their Therapists’ Ratings of Personality Disorder Traits
Douglas B Samuel (2018)
10.1016/J.JRP.2018.07.005
Spousal Agreement on Partner Personality Ratings is Moderated by Relationship Satisfaction
Matthew R. J. Vandermeer (2018)
10.1002/cpp.2193
Dimensional measure of self and interpersonal functioning: Comparisons with treatment alliance and readiness for inpatient psychotherapy.
G. Haggerty (2018)
10.1080/24732850.2018.1490682
The Ethics of Empathy: Walking a Fine Line in Forensic Evaluations
Abby L. Mulay (2018)
10.1159/000487362
A Preliminary Probe of Personality Predicting Psychotherapy Outcomes: Perspectives from Therapists and Their Clients
D. Samuel (2018)
10.1080/00223891.2017.1331913
The Fantasy Questionnaire: A Measure to Assess Creative and Imaginative Fantasy
D. Weibel (2018)
10.1016/J.AIP.2018.03.005
Body drawings as an assessment tool in somatoform disorder
H. Kalisvaart (2018)
10.1177/1073191116643818
Development and Examination of the Five-Factor Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory–Short Form
Sarah A Griffin (2018)
10.1521/pedi_2018_32_356
The General Criteria for Personality Disorders Assessed by Interview: Do They Still Have a Role to Play?
J. Peri (2018)
Psychological features of functional voice disorders
Mafalda Bordalo Andrea (2018)
Ethical Sensitivity in the Academic Setting
Rebecca E Friedman (2017)
10.1037/per0000188
Object Relations Predicts Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms Beyond Emotional Dysregulation, Negative Affect, and Impulsivity
S. Huprich (2017)
10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_14
Nonverbal Assessment of Personality and Psychopathology
J. Wasserman (2017)
10.1080/00223891.2015.1055358
Using the TAT to Assess the Relation Between Gender Identity and the Use of Defense Mechanisms
P. Cramer (2017)
10.1097/NMD.0000000000000676
Role of Personality Functioning in the Quality of Life of Patients with Depression
Carla Crempien (2017)
10.1177/1073191116636450
Convergence of Self-Reports and Informant Reports on the Personality Assessment Screener
Shannon E Kelley (2017)
10.1016/J.JRP.2017.08.006
Explicit and implicit shame aversion predict symptoms of avoidant and borderline personality disorders
C. J. Currie (2017)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar