Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Switchgrass From North Dakota – An Adaptable And Promising Energy Crop For Northern Regions Of Europe

N. Lemežienė, E. Norkevičienė, Ž. Liatukas, G. Dabkevičienė, J. Cecevičienė, B. Butkutė
Published 2015 · Biology

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Searching for novel energy crops, an interest in C4-type plant switchgrass (SWG) has increased worldwide. The present research was aimed to study SWG genetic resources for most important agrobiological traits with a view of extending the range of energy plants in the Nemoral zone of Europe. SWG was studied for the peculiarities of developmental stages, winter hardiness, and dry matter (DM) yield. SWG regrowth in spring started one month later compared to the reed canary grass (variety ‘Chiefton’). All investigated genotypes matured seeds in the second half of September. The most winter-hardy SWG accessions (0–20% winter damage) were the majority of wild ecotypes and the variety ‘Dacotah’ from North Dakota (2–4 hardiness zone) as well as the variety ‘Summer’ from South Nebraska (4, 5 hardiness zone). Ecotypes from North Dakota exhibited a high breeding potential and prospects in Northern regions of Europe due to genotypic variation of winter hardiness trait. The varieties ‘Alamo’, ‘Falcon’, ‘Grenville’, ‘Shawnee’, and ‘Trailblazer’ that originated from warmer climate zones (6–9 hardiness zone) were heavily damaged or completely killed. The worst overwinter survival of plants was recorded after the first winter. DM yield was estimated at two regimens of cutting. When grass was cut once at seed maturity stage, DM yield in the first harvest year was 249 g per plant, in the second harvest year 349 g per plant, and in the third harvest year 493 g per plant. When grass was cut twice per season (at the beginning of anthesis and after regrowth of aftermath), DM yield was significantly lower: in the first harvest year the DM yield was 203 g per plant (18.4% less), in the second harvest year 182 g per plant (47.9% less), and in the third harvest year 272 g per plant (44.7% less).
This paper references
Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: Sensitivity to climate change, diets and yields
H. Haberl (2011)
New opportunities for the exploitation of energy crops by thermochemical conversion in Northern Europe and the UK
M. Robbins (2012)
Switchgrass breeding, genetics
Casler (2012)
Switchgrass production and establishment in the Southern Italy climatic conditions.
I. Piscioneri (2001)
Ecotypic variation among switchgrass
Casler (2005)
Determination of the highest biomass producing plant genera (C4 grasses) of the world for temperate climates
W. Stander (1989)
Chloroplast DNA and nuclear DNA content variations among cultivars of switchgrass
Sherry J. Hultquist (1996)
China's bioenergy potential
Tao Sang (2011)
Sumedėjusių augalų ištvermingumo zonos Lietuvoje, žiemos pakenkimai ir jų vertinimas [Winter hardiness zones of woody plants in Lithuania, winter damages and its evaluations
Navys EV. (2008)
C4 plants as biofuel feedstocks: optimising biomass production and feedstock quality from a lignocellulosic perspective.
Caitlin S Byrt (2011)
Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States.
S. Mclaughlin (2005)
An overview of second generation biofuel technologies.
R. H. Sims (2010)
Latitudinal and Longitudinal Adaptation of Switchgrass Populations
M. Casler (2007)
The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe
I. Lewandowski (2003)
Determination of the highest biomass producing plant genera (C 4 grasses) of the world for temperate climates. Assessment study for the commission of European communities
W Stander (1989)
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivar adaptation, biomass production, and cellulose concentration as affected by latitude of origin.
P. Jefferson (2012)
Global climate niche
JN Barney (2011)
Switchgrass, Big Bluestem, and Indiangrass
L. E. Moser (1995)
Chloroplast DNA and nuclear
SM Kappler (1996)
Ecotypic Variation among Switchgrass Populations from the Northern USA
M. Casler (2005)
Global Climate Niche Estimates for Bioenergy Crops and Invasive Species of Agronomic Origin: Potential Problems and Opportunities
J. Barney (2011)
Biomass yields for upland and lowland switchgrass varieties grown in the Mediterranean region
E. Alexopoulou (2008)
Comments: Main developments and trends of international energy plants
Liu Zeng-Hui (2010)
Switchgrass variety choice in Europe
H. W. Elbersen (2001)
Switchgrass Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics
M. Casler (2012)
The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting
E. Smeets (2009)
An evaluation of biomass yield stability of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars
N. Sharma (2003)
Cultivation of Miscanthus × giganteus for biofuel and its tolerance of Lithuania's climate.
Aldona Kryževičienė (2011)
Crop Management of Switchgrass
M. Sanderson (2012)
The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels
D. Parrish (2005)
Switchgrass as an Energy Crop: Fertilization, Cultivar, and Cutting Management
R. Lemus (2004)

This paper is referenced by
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) from North Dakota—a New Bioenergy Crop for the Nemoral Zone of Europe
E. Norkevičienė (2016)
Biomass yield components for 12 switchgrass cultivars grown in Northern China
Y. Yue (2017)
1-1-2017 Development and Testing of Cool-Season Grass Species , Varieties and Hybrids for Biomass Feedstock Production in Western North America
S. R. Larson (2016)
Green fabricated zinc oxide nanoformulated media enhanced callus induction and regeneration dynamics of Panicum virgatum L.
Saima Shafique (2020)
Development and Testing of Cool-Season Grass Species, Varieties and Hybrids for Biomass Feedstock Production in Western North America
S. R. Larson (2017)
Evaluation of parameters affecting switchgrass tissue culture: toward a consolidated procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum)
Chien-Yuan Lin (2017)
Variation in leaf‐level photosynthesis among switchgrass genotypes exposed to low temperatures does not scale with final biomass yield
Á. Cordero (2017)
Green Fabricated Zinc Oxide Nanoformulated Media Enhanced Callus Induction and Regeneration Dynamics of Panicum virgatum L.
Saima Shafique (2020)
The Variation of Ash and Inorganic Elements Concentrations in the Biomass of Lithuania-Grown Switchgrass (Panicum Virgatum L.)
Bronislava Butkutė (2015)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar