Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Fisher's Preferences And Trade‐offs Between Management Options

M. Fitzpatrick, C. Maravelias, O. R. Eigaard, S. Hynes, D. Reid
Published 2017 · Business

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Failure to understand the potential responses of fishers to management measures creates a significant risk of revisiting the familiar scenario of perverse and unintended consequences of those measures. This paper reports on a choice experiment survey to evaluate fisher's preferences for various management measures proposed under the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) reform process, but the conclusions have wider relevance as similar measures are used by comparable fleets in fisheries globally. The survey was conducted with fishers involved in mixed pelagic and demersal fisheries in Ireland, pelagic fisheries in Denmark and demersal fisheries in Greece. Fisheries management policies were characterized by five attributes designed both to cover the principal CFP reform proposals and to integrate ecological, social, economic and institutional factors affecting fisher's decisions. The study uses a random utility modelling framework to reveal the preferences of the fishers across the alternative policy attributes. Results show that while there are generally preferences both for healthy stocks and for maintaining the importance of fishing to the local community, strong interfishery preference differences exist. These differences are most notable in relation to a discard ban and to the use of individual transferable fishing rights, favoured in Denmark, but not in Ireland for instance. The strength of these interfishery differences supports the assertion that there are no panaceas in fisheries management and that solutions should be tailored within the context of specific fisheries. Not doing so could create a significant risk of inappropriately managed fisheries that may lead to unsustainable outcomes.
This paper references
10.1162/003465398557735
Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level
David Revelt (1998)
10.1080/09640568.2010.547691
Estimating the welfare impacts of agricultural landscape change in Ireland: a choice experiment approach
S. Hynes (2011)
10.1093/ICESJMS/FSR013
Quantifying fishers' and citizens' support for Dutch flatfish management policy
R. Groeneveld (2011)
10.1016/J.MARPOL.2012.12.035
Valuing improvements to coastal waters using choice experiments: An application to revisions of the EU Bathing Waters Directive
S. Hynes (2013)
10.5751/ES-04503-170106
Growing into Interdisciplinarity: How to Converge Biology, Economics, and Social Science in Fisheries Research?
P. Haapasaari (2012)
10.12681/MMS.124
Practical issues in choosing a framework for resource assessment and management of Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries.
J. Caddy (2009)
10.1017/CBO9780511753930
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation by Kenneth E. Train
K. Train (2003)
10.1111/FME.12060
Fisheries management scenarios: trade‐offs between economic and biological objectives
C. Maravelias (2014)
10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.070
The Alarming Decline of Mediterranean Fish Stocks
Paraskevas Vasilakopoulos (2014)
10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2015.08.011
Key issues and drivers affecting coastal and marine resource decisions: Participatory management strategy evaluation to support adaptive management
Leo Dutra (2015)
10.1093/ICESJMS/FSM040
Unintended and perverse consequences of ignoring linkages in fisheries systems
P. Degnbol (2007)
10.2307/3655810
Are Commercial Fishers Risk-Lovers?
H. Eggert (2004)
10.1007/978-94-007-7911-2_3
From Boom and Bust to Local Stewardship: A Governance Benchmark for Celtic Sea Fisheries Management
M. Fitzpatrick (2014)
10.1016/J.MARPOL.2014.09.022
The regional management of fisheries in European Western Waters
P. Floch (2015)
10.1093/ICESJMS/FST120
Socio-economic and institutional incentives influencing fishers' behaviour in relation to fishing practices and discard
S. Eliasen (2012)
10.3923/JAS.2009.3850.3856
Understanding Factors Considered by Fishermen in Marine Protected Area Planning and Management: Case Study of Claveria, Philippines
C. Launio (2009)
10.1016/J.MARPOL.2010.12.001
Net economic impacts of achieving maximum economic yield in fisheries
A. Norman-López (2010)
10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2014.05.014
Social objectives of fisheries management: What are managers' priorities?
S. Pascoe (2014)
10.1093/ICESJMS/FSP084
A bottom-up approach to technological development and its management implications in a commercial fishery
O. R. Eigaard (2009)
10.3390/RESOURCES2030406
Preferences for Management of Near-Shore Marine Ecosystems: A Choice Experiment in New Zealand
Sophal Chhun (2013)
10.1080/09640560701261661
Using choice experiments to design wetland management programmes: The case of Severn Estuary Wetland, UK
E. Birol (2007)
10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.010
Including risk in stated-preference economic valuations: Experiments on choices for marine recreation.
J. Wielgus (2009)
10.1023/A:1008287310583
Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment
N. Hanley (1998)
Understanding the cultures of fishing communities : a key to fisheries management and food security
J. R. McGoodwin (2001)
10.1016/J.FISHRES.2008.08.001
Whatever became of social objectives in fisheries policy
David Symes (2009)
10.1111/J.1467-2979.2010.00371.X
Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management
E. Fulton (2011)
10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide
E. D. de Bekker-Grob (2015)
10.5950/0738-1360-27.4.343
Modeling the Behavior of Marlin Anglers in the Western Pacific
John Duffield (2012)
10.1007/S11116-013-9451-Z
Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments
J. Rose (2013)
10.1093/ICESJMS/FSS189
Design or pragmatic evolution: applying ITQs in EU fisheries management
L. V. Hoof (2013)
10.1111/J.1467-2979.2012.00460.X
Rebuilding global fisheries: the World Summit Goal, costs and benefits
Yimin Ye (2013)
10.1093/ICESJMS/FSU142
Review and refinement of an existing qualitative risk assessment method for application within an ecosystem-based management framework
W. J. Fletcher (2015)
10.1016/J.MARPOL.2015.05.002
Economic gains from introducing international ITQs - the case of the mackerel and herring fisheries in the Northeast Atlantic
Thomas Lindberg Thøgersen (2015)
10.1016/J.FISHRES.2010.12.026
Setting an agenda for social science research in fisheries policy in Northern Europe
J. Urquhart (2011)
10.5751/ES-05124-170406
Suitability of Local Resource Management Practices Based on Supernatural Enforcement Mechanisms in the Local Social-cultural Context
M. Sasaoka (2012)
10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01148.x
Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models
S. Hynes (2008)
10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2013.05.014
Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application
Yingluk Kanchanaroek (2013)
10.1111/J.1467-2979.2010.00373.X
Overfishing and the Common Fisheries Policy: (un)successful results from TAC regulation?
S. Villasante (2011)
Pretty good governance: balancing policy drivers and stakeholder interests in developing fisheries ecosystem plans
T. Fitzpatrick (2013)
10.1080/23308249.2014.899557
Technological Development and Fisheries Management
O. R. Eigaard (2014)
10.1016/J.MARPOL.2013.08.009
Measuring the social and economic performance of catch share programs: Definition of metrics and application to the U.S. Northeast Region groundfish fishery
Patricia M. Clay (2014)
10.1890/11-1319.1
What are we protecting? Fisher behavior and the unintended consequences of spatial closures as a fishery management tool.
Joshua K. Abbott (2012)
10.1111/FAF.12058
A framework for evaluating management plans comprehensively
V. Trenkel (2015)
10.1371/journal.pone.0097941
Estimating Landholders’ Probability of Participating in a Stewardship Program, and the Implications for Spatial Conservation Priorities
V. Adams (2014)
10.1093/ICESJMS/FSW226
Inclusion of ecological, economic, social, and institutional considerations when setting targets and limits for multispecies fisheries
A. Rindorf (2017)
10.1080/10871200591003427
A Stated Preference Choice Approach to Understanding Angler Preferences for Management Options
C. Oh (2005)
10.1016/J.MARPOL.2009.02.008
Stakeholder objective preferences in Australian Commonwealth managed fisheries
S. Pascoe (2009)



This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar