Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Evaluation Of Warm‐season Grasses Nutritive Value As Alternatives To Cool‐season Grasses Under Limited Irrigation

J. Robins
Published 2016 · Biology

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
The production of cool-season grasses is limited by their photosynthetic inefficiency during the hot summer months. Therefore, a study was conducted during 2006 and 2007 at a Logan, UT, USA field site to determine the potential of various warm-season grasses as alternatives to cool-season grasses during summer under limited irrigation. The study included 20 environments, which corresponded to combinations of the 2 years, two harvest dates (June and July) and five irrigation levels. There were differences among the 27 varieties (21 warm-season and six cool-season) for crude protein (CP), in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD), water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) and biomass (BM) across the 20 environments. However, the overall variety effects were ameliorated by the presence of genotype by environment interaction for CP, WSC, BM, and to a lesser extent IVTD. The cool-season grasses generally possessed higher trait values in each environment, yet there were several warm-season grasses, such as big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) variety ‘Bison’ and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) variety ‘Trailblazer’ that possessed higher values for the nutritive value traits. Additionally, these warm-season grass varieties possessed substantially higher BM than any cool-season grass varieties. Thus, there are warm-season grass varieties that combine high BM and higher nutritive value in the summer months under limited irrigation. These may prove to be viable forage alternatives to the cool-season grasses during the summer slump period.
This paper references
Fuel Ethanol from Cellulosic Biomass
L. Lynd (1991)
Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes
H. Gauch (1997)
Latitudinal Adaptation of Switchgrass Populations
M. Casler (2004)
Enhancing Water Use Efficiency in Irrigated Agriculture
T. Howell (2001)
Growth, P Uptake, and Quality of Warm and Cool-Season Grasses on a Low Available P Soil 1
R. Morris (1982)
Nonstructural carbohydrates in oat forage.
N. Chatterton (2006)
Grazing evaluation of big bluestems bred for improved forage yield and digestibility
R. Mitchell (2005)
Genetic Analysis of Cell Wall Traits Relevant to Cellulosic Ethanol Production in Maize (Zea mays L.)
A. Lorenz (2010)
Statistical analysis of results from irrigation experiments using the line-source sprinkler system.
R. Hanks (1980)
Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA.
R. Lemus (2002)
Irrigated warm- and cool-season grasses compared in Northern California pastures
M. George (1992)
Leaf and Stem Forage Quality of Big Bluestem and Switchgrass1
J. L. Griffin (1983)
Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4
D. Bates (2015)
Identification of Creeping Foxtail Germplasm with High Dry Matter Yield and Nutritive Value
J. Robins (2011)
Cool-season grasses produce more total biomass across the growing season than do warm-season grasses when managed with an applied irrigation gradient
J. Robins (2010)
Establishment of warm-season grasses in summer and damage in winter under supplementary irrigation in a semi-arid environment at high elevation in western United States of America.
J. Robins (2009)
Forages and Pastures Symposium: assessing drought vulnerability of agricultural production systems in context of the 2012 drought.
O. Kellner (2014)
Irrigation in the American West: Area, Water and Economic Activity
N. Gollehon (2000)

This paper is referenced by
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar