Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

A New Material Mapping Procedure For Quantitative Computed Tomography-based, Continuum Finite Element Analyses Of The Vertebra.

G. Unnikrishnan, E. Morgan
Published 2011 · Engineering, Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Inaccuracies in the estimation of material properties and errors in the assignment of these properties into finite element models limit the reliability, accuracy, and precision of quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element analyses of the vertebra. In this work, a new mesh-independent, material mapping procedure was developed to improve the quality of predictions of vertebral mechanical behavior from QCT-based finite element models. In this procedure, an intermediate step, called the material block model, was introduced to determine the distribution of material properties based on bone mineral density, and these properties were then mapped onto the finite element mesh. A sensitivity study was first conducted on a calibration phantom to understand the influence of the size of the material blocks on the computed bone mineral density. It was observed that varying the material block size produced only marginal changes in the predictions of mineral density. Finite element (FE) analyses were then conducted on a square column-shaped region of the vertebra and also on the entire vertebra in order to study the effect of material block size on the FE-derived outcomes. The predicted values of stiffness for the column and the vertebra decreased with decreasing block size. When these results were compared to those of a mesh convergence analysis, it was found that the influence of element size on vertebral stiffness was less than that of the material block size. This mapping procedure allows the material properties in a finite element study to be determined based on the block size required for an accurate representation of the material field, while the size of the finite elements can be selected independently and based on the required numerical accuracy of the finite element solution. The mesh-independent, material mapping procedure developed in this study could be particularly helpful in improving the accuracy of finite element analyses of vertebroplasty and spine metastases, as these analyses typically require mesh refinement at the interfaces between distinct materials. Moreover, the mapping procedure is not specific to the vertebra and could thus be applied to many other anatomic sites.
This paper references
10.1016/J.BONE.2006.10.025
Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.
J. Buckley (2007)
Structure and Function of Normal. Degenerate, and Surgically Fixed Spinal .Segments." in Advance.^ in Spinal Fusion: Molecular Science. BiuMcclianic.i and Clinical Manaacmenl
J Fazzalari.N..Costi.J. (2003)
10.1016/j.compmedimag.2006.09.004
Intervertebral disc biomechanical analysis using the finite element modeling based on medical images
H. Li (2006)
" Computed Tumogra - phy - Based Finite Element Analysis Predicts Failure Loads and Fracture Pattems for Vertebral Sections . "
P. Crawford.R. (2003)
10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00081-2
Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method.
C. Zannoni (1998)
10.1115/1.2796021
Automated finite element analysis of excised human femora based on precision -QCT.
B. Merz (1996)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2003.09.027
Effects of tumor location, shape and surface serration on burst fracture risk in the metastatic spine.
C. E. Tschirhart (2004)
10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00011-2
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site.
E. Morgan (2001)
10.1302/0301-620X.67B4.4030863
The effect of posture on the lumbar spine.
M. Adams (1985)
10.1115/1.2720906
A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
Z. Yosibash (2007)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.006
Finite element analysis of the spine: towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis.
A. Jones (2008)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2004.07.023
Biomechanical assessment of stability in the metastatic spine following percutaneous vertebroplasty: effects of cement distribution patterns and volume.
C. E. Tschirhart (2005)
" Meclianical Evaluation by Patient - Specific Finite Element Analyses tJeinonstrates Therapeutic Effects for Osleoporotic Vertebrae . "
D. Tawara. (2010)
10.1097/00007632-200107150-00010
Osteoporosis Changes the Amount of Vertebral Trabecular Bone at Risk of Fracture but Not the Vertebral Load Distribution
J. Homminga (2001)
10.1243/09544119JEIM285
Development of specimen-specific finite element models of human vertebrae for the analysis of vertebroplasty
V. N. Wijayathunga (2008)
10.1016/0021-9290(90)90294-D
Computer aided stress analysis of long bones utilizing computed tomography.
S. Marom (1990)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.12.003
A finite element analysis of a T12 vertebra in two consecutive examinations to evaluate the progress of osteoporosis.
C. Provatidis (2009)
10.1097/01.BRS.0000049923.27694.47
Finite Element Modeling of the Human Thoracolumbar Spine
M. Liebschner (2003)
10.1359/jbmr.061011
Effects of Teriparatide and Alendronate on Vertebral Strength as Assessed by Finite Element Modeling of QCT Scans in Women With Osteoporosis
T. M. Keaveny (2007)
10.1097/01.BRS.0000051910.97211.BA
Burst Fracture in the Metastatically Involved Spine: Development, Validation, and Parametric Analysis of a Three-Dimensional Poroelastic Finite-Element Model
C. Whyne (2003)
10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.08.002
Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.
A. Zeinali (2010)
10.1016/0141-5425(90)90022-F
Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method.
J. Keyak (1990)
10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00210-2
Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
R. Crawford (2003)
" Finite Element Modeling of the Human Thoracolumbar
J. Mothcrway. (2007)
10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.06.006
Computational biomechanical modelling of the lumbar spine using marching-cubes surface smoothened finite element voxel meshing
Z. Wang (2005)
10.1115/1.2800791
Assessment of factors influencing finite element vertebral model predictions.
A. Jones (2007)
Effects of Tumor Location
A Tschirhart.C.E..Nagpurkar. (2004)
2 ( X ) 4 . " An Improved Method for the Automatic Mapping of Computed Tomography Numbers onto Finite Element Models
M. Keaveny.T. (2002)
Fracture but Not the Vertebral t^ad Distribution." Spine
A Razmjoo. (2009)
10.1002/JOR.1100160305
Computed tomography‐based finite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections
M. Silva (1998)
Finite Element Analysis of the Spine
Strength. Bone (2008)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.042
On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.
Majid Mirzaei (2009)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2006.08.003
Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
M. Bessho (2007)
10.1148/RADIOLOGY.179.3.2027972
Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis.
K. Faulkner (1991)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.040
A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models.
G. Chen (2010)
Fracture but Not the Vertebral t^ad Distribution." Spine
A Razmjoo. (2009)
10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00098-8
The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone.
D. Ulrich (1999)
Effect of Bone
E Faulkner.K.G..Cann.C. (1991)
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.03.001
Mechanical evaluation by patient-specific finite element analyses demonstrates therapeutic effects for osteoporotic vertebrae.
Daisuke Tawara (2010)
10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00185-1
Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone
D. Kopperdahl (2002)
10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00138-3
An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models.
F. Taddei (2004)
10.1016/8756-3282(87)90074-3
Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals.
L. Mosekilde (1987)
10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2007.06.017
Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.
Z. Yosibash (2007)



This paper is referenced by
10.1007/5584_2018_192
Effects of Breast and Prostate Cancer Metastases on Lumbar Spine Biomechanics: Rapid In Silico Evaluation.
Jacek Lorkowski (2018)
CT Based Finite Element Analysis Of Human Lumbar Vertebra With Accurate Geometric and Material Property Assumptions
(2017)
10.1115/1.4025179
Effect of specimen-specific anisotropic material properties in quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis of the vertebra.
G. Unnikrishnan (2013)
3-D visualization and prediction of spine fractures under axial loading
H. Ali (2013)
10.1186/s41747-020-00172-3
Image-based biomechanical models of the musculoskeletal system
F. Galbusera (2020)
10.1186/s40634-016-0072-2
Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) derived Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in finite element studies: a review of the literature
N. Knowles (2016)
10.12989/ABA.2013.1.1.015
Repeatable calibration of Hounsfield units to mineral density and effect of scanning medium
Meghan C. Crookshank (2014)
10.1115/1.4034172
Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
H. Giambini (2016)
10.1007/978-3-319-95708-1
Rehabilitation Science in Context
M. Pokorski (2018)
10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.05.006
Comparisons of node-based and element-based approaches of assigning bone material properties onto subject-specific finite element models.
G. Chen (2015)
10.1007/978-3-319-21296-8_15
In-silico models of trabecular bone: a sensitivity analysis perspective
Marlène Mengoni (2016)
10.7712/130113.4398.S2139
MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION ISSUES IN FEA OF LONG BONES
Nikola Korunovic (2013)
10.1080/21681163.2016.1188729
Material-driven mesh of the lumbar spine derived from CT data
Ho Quang Nguyen (2018)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar