Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping And Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.

H. Giambini, D. Dragomir-Daescu, A. Nassr, M. Yaszemski, C. Zhao
Published 2016 · Mathematics, Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Quantitative computed tomography-based finite-element analysis (QCT/FEA) has become increasingly popular in an attempt to understand and possibly reduce vertebral fracture risk. It is known that scanning acquisition settings affect Hounsfield units (HU) of the CT voxels. Material properties assignments in QCT/FEA, relating HU to Young's modulus, are performed by applying empirical equations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of QCT scanning protocols on predicted stiffness values from finite-element models. One fresh frozen cadaveric torso and a QCT calibration phantom were scanned six times varying voltage and current and reconstructed to obtain a total of 12 sets of images. Five vertebrae from the torso were experimentally tested to obtain stiffness values. QCT/FEA models of the five vertebrae were developed for the 12 image data resulting in a total of 60 models. Predicted stiffness was compared to the experimental values. The highest percent difference in stiffness was approximately 480% (80 kVp, 110 mAs, U70), while the lowest outcome was ∼1% (80 kVp, 110 mAs, U30). There was a clear distinction between reconstruction kernels in predicted outcomes, whereas voltage did not present a clear influence on results. The potential of QCT/FEA as an improvement to conventional fracture risk prediction tools is well established. However, it is important to establish research protocols that can lead to results that can be translated to the clinical setting.
This paper references
Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
J. Paul (2012)
Effect of specimen-specific anisotropic material properties in quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis of the vertebra.
G. Unnikrishnan (2013)
Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners.
C. Cann (1987)
Specimen-Specific Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling to Predict Vertebrae Fracture Loads After Vertebroplasty
Y. Matsuura (2014)
The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation.
H. Giambini (2015)
The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.
C. Levi (1982)
Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone
D. Kopperdahl (2002)
QCT/FEA predictions of femoral stiffness are strongly affected by boundary condition modeling
T. Rossman (2016)
Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength.
P. Zysset (2013)
A new material mapping procedure for quantitative computed tomography-based, continuum finite element analyses of the vertebra.
G. Unnikrishnan (2011)
Prediction of new clinical vertebral fractures in elderly men using finite element analysis of CT scans
Xiang Wang (2012)
Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.
D. Dragomir-Daescu (2015)
Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography
C. Les (1994)
Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.
E. Morgan (2003)
Robust QCT/FEA Models of Proximal Femur Stiffness and Fracture Load During a Sideways Fall on the Hip
D. Dragomir-Daescu (2010)
Specimen-specific vertebral fracture modeling: a feasibility study using the extended finite element method
H. Giambini (2015)
Novel anthropomorphic hip phantom corrects systemic interscanner differences in proximal femoral vBMD.
S. Bonaretti (2014)
On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.
Majid Mirzaei (2009)
Measurement of Image Quality in CT Images Reconstructed with Different Kernels
Keun Jo Jang (2011)
Analysis of strength and failure pattern of human proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.
Majid Mirzaei (2014)
Nonlinear Finite Element Model Predicts Vertebral Bone Strength and Fracture Site
K. Imai (2006)
In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.
A. Cong (2011)

This paper is referenced by
Opportunistic Computed Tomography and Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review
Matthew Shirley (2020)
Overview and Evaluation of a Computational Bone Physiology Modeling Toolchain and Its Application to Testing of Exercise Countermeasures
A. Schepelmann (2018)
Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease
T. Damron (2020)
Effect of metastatic lesion size and location on the load-bearing capacity of vertebrae using an optimized ash density-modulus equation
S. Saldarriaga (2020)
Effects of Scan Resolutions and Element Sizes on Bovine Vertebral Mechanical Parameters from Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Analysis
Meng Zhang (2017)
The Influence of Reconstruction Kernel on Bone Mineral and Strength Estimates Using Quantitative Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis.
Andrew S Michalski (2019)
Effect of different CT scanners and settings on femoral failure loads calculated by finite element models
F. Eggermont (2018)
Dual-energy estimates of volumetric bone mineral densities in the lumbar spine using quantitative computed tomography better correlate with fracture properties when compared to single-energy BMD outcomes.
Simon Cataño Jimenez (2019)
Deciphering the ?Art? in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint.
A. Erdemir (2019)
Density-Dependent Material and Failure Criteria Equations Highly Affect the Accuracy and Precision of QCT/FEA-Based Predictions of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Properties
M. Prado (2020)
What is the future of patient-specific vertebral fracture prediction?
H. Giambini (2017)
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar