Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

How Do Consumers Search For And Appraise Health Information On The World Wide Web? Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups, Usability Tests, And In-depth Interviews

G. Eysenbach, C. Köhler
Published 2002 · Computer Science, Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
Abstract Objectives: To describe techniques for retrieval and appraisal used by consumers when they search for health information on the internet. Design: Qualitative study using focus groups, naturalistic observation of consumers searching the world wide web in a usability laboratory, and in-depth interviews. Participants: A total of 21 users of the internet participated in three focus group sessions. 17 participants were given a series of health questions and observed in a usability laboratory setting while retrieving health information from the web; this was followed by in-depth interviews. Setting: Heidelberg, Germany. Results: Although their search technique was often suboptimal, internet users successfully found health information to answer questions in an average of 5 minutes 42 seconds (median 4 minutes 18 seconds) per question. Participants in focus groups said that when assessing the credibility of a website they primarily looked for the source, a professional design, a scientific or official touch, language, and ease of use. However, in the observational study, no participants checked any “about us” sections of websites, disclaimers, or disclosure statements. In the post-search interviews, it emerged that very few participants had noticed and remembered which websites they had retrieved information from. Conclusions: Further observational studies are needed to design and evaluate educational and technological innovations for guiding consumers to high quality health information on the web. What is already known on this topic Little is known about how consumers retrieve and assess the quality of health information on the internet Qualitative data are needed to design educational and technological innovations to guide consumers to high quality health information What this study adds Users of the internet explore only the first few links on general search engines when seeking health information Consumers say that when assessing the credibility of a site they primarily look for the source, a professional design, and a variety of other criteria In practice, internet users do not check the “about us” sections of websites, try to find out who authors or owners of the site are, or read disclaimers or disclosure statements Very few internet users later remember from which websites they retrieved information or who stood behind the sites
This paper references
5 e-Health Ethics Initiative. e-Health code of ethics
(2000)
10.1016/S0010-4825(98)00037-7
The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites.
C. Boyer (1998)
10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1496
Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information.
G. Eysenbach (1998)
10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1511
Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey.
Kathleen Margaret Griffiths (2000)
10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1511
Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey
K. Griffiths (2000)
Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet.
J. Pennbridge (1999)
10.1001/JAMA.1997.03540390074039
Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.
W. M. Silberg (1997)
Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web
Susan Price (1999)
10.1093/PUBMED/22.2.191
Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings.
V. Abbott (2000)
10.5555/uri:pii:0882596394900442
Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques
P. Jordan (1994)
The impact of displayed awards on the credibility and retention of Web site information
J. Shon (2000)
Measuring quality and impact of the world wide web [ commentary ]
JC Wyatt (1997)
e-Health code of ethics
10.1136/bmj.324.7337.577
Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites
F. Meric (2002)
www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=26 (accessed 1
(2001)
Preventive health information on the Internet. Qualitative study of consumers' perspectives.
Y. Quintana (2001)
10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875
Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home
P. Impicciatore (1997)
10.1097/00007632-200103010-00020
Surfing for Back Pain Patients: The Nature and Quality of Back Pain Information on the Internet
L. Li (2001)
10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups
J. Kitzinger (1995)
Qualitative study of consumers' perspectives
Y. Quintana (2001)
10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1713
Consumer health informatics
G. Eysenbach (2000)
10.1055/S-0038-1634181
Labeling and filtering of medical information on the Internet.
G. Eysenbach (1999)
10.1007/1-4020-4653-7_4
Usability engineering
J. Nielsen (1997)
The online health care revolution: how the web helps americans take better care of themselves
S. Fox (2000)
10.1136/bmj.323.7312.552
Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services
M. Rigby (2001)
10.1001/JAMA.285.20.2612
Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.
G. Berland (2001)
Surfing the Net--information on the World Wide Web for persons with arthritis: patient empowerment or patient deceit?
M. Suarez-Almazor (2001)
10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80113-0
Evaluation of the quality of self-education mammography material available for patients on the Internet.
E. Tamm (2000)
10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-W
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.
D. Moher (1995)



This paper is referenced by
10.2147/JAA.S133536
Evaluating asthma websites using the Brief DISCERN instrument
N. Banasiak (2017)
10.1097/00005721-200601000-00006
Evaluation of Breastfeeding Web Sites for Patient Education
Barbara A Dornan (2006)
Is Hearing Believing? Perception of Online Information Credibility by Screen Reader Users who are Blind or Visually Impaired
S. Chandrashekar (2011)
Librarians, Faculty, and the Google Generation: Enhancing Student Research through Collaboration
J. Michael DeMars (2011)
User Interface Design – Usability Portable Media Devices – Usability PRESENTING STRUCTURED, RSS-FED NEW MEDIA STREAMS WITHIN A PORTABLE MEDIA PLAYER: A CATEGORY OR SOURCE ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION by
Timothy J C Bryant (2006)
[Content analysis of websites directed to low back pain].
Nebahat Gülcü (2010)
A cross-section survey of health information-seeking practices among young adults on a South African university campus
Estelle Van Niekerk (2012)
The Effect of Color in Website Design: Searching for Medical Information Online
Gabriel Nordeborn (2013)
10.12968/JOHV.2013.1.10.582
Exploring health visitors' use of information and communication technologies with vulnerable families
Pamela N. Schultz (2013)
10.1097/01.mlr.0000156858.81146.0e
Increasing Response Rates in a Survey of Medicaid Enrollees: The Effect of a Prepaid Monetary Incentive and Mixed Modes (Mail and Telephone)
T. Beebe (2005)
10.1002/ARIS.144.V41:1
Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework
Soo Young Rieh (2007)
10.1016/J.LISR.2013.04.007
Health answer quality evaluation by librarians, nurses, and users in social Q&A
S. Oh (2013)
10.15503/JECS20131.57.70
Internet addiction and cyberchondria - Their relationship with Well-Being
E. Ivanova (2020)
10.1111/codi.14548
Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer
R. Garfinkle (2019)
10.1016/j.intcom.2006.10.002
Going online for health advice: Changes in usage and trust practices over the last five years
Elizabeth Sillence (2007)
10.1016/S0958-2592(03)00010-5
Consumer health information on the WWW: an evaluation of information on verrucae
M. Ellis (2003)
10.1002/PDI.818
How do people with diabetes access information
J. Robertson (2005)
10.1111/J.1745-6606.2005.00004.X
Cues of Credibility and Price Performance of Life Insurance Comparison Web Sites
R. N. Mayer (2005)
10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01504.x
Consumer Evaluation of Genetic Information Online: The Role of Quality on Attitude and Behavioral Intentions
Mohan J. Dutta (2010)
URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN WOMEN AGED 18-64: DOCTORS', PATIENTS', AND LAY PERCEPTIONS AND UNDERSTANDINGS.
J. Larcombe (2012)
Trust Online: Young Adults' Evaluation of Web Content
E. Hargittai (2010)
10.2196/jmir.2428
Measuring Actual eHealth Literacy Among Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: a Qualitative Analysis of Problems Encountered Using Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 Applications
R. van der Vaart (2013)
Information Sources in Relation to Information Quality, Information-seeking, and Uncertainty in the Context of Healthcare Reform
J. Bevan (2013)
10.1016/J.ANNRMP.2004.03.001
Évaluation de la qualité de l'information concernant l'incontinence urinaire féminine sur le web francophone
P. Givron (2004)
10.1258/JRSM.96.10.490
The National Health Service and the Internet
S. Lusignan (2003)
10.1007/s00103-003-0592-7
Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen
R. Klar (2003)
10.1136/ebmh.6.3.66
The internet and mental health practice
H. Christensen (2003)
Toward a Categorization Scheme of Child Find, Referral, Early Identification and Eligibility Determination Practices
C. Dunst (2004)
10.2196/JMIR.6.3.E24
The Effect of Top-Level Domains and Advertisements on Health Web Site Credibility
J. Walther (2004)
10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.007
Using hit curves to compare search algorithm performance
J. Herskovic (2007)
10.3389/fcomm.2020.00012
“Well, the Message Is From the Institute of Something”: Exploring Source Trust of Cancer-Related Messages on Simulated Facebook Posts
N. Trivedi (2020)
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104093
What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model
M. Shim (2020)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar