Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
Please confirm you are human
(Sign Up for free to never see this)
← Back to Search

Towards Complete And Accurate Reporting Of Studies Of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

P. Bossuyt, J. Reitsma, D. Bruns, C. Gatsonis, P. Glasziou, L. Irwig, J. Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, H. D. de Vet
Published 2003 · Medicine

Save to my Library
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
OBJECTIVE To improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy, to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in a study, and to evaluate a study's generalisability. METHODS The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) steering committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and extracted potential items into an extensive list. Researchers, editors, and members of professional organisations shortened this list during a two day consensus meeting, with the goal of developing a checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS The search for published guidelines about diagnostic research yielded 33 previously published checklists, from which we extracted a list of 75 potential items. At the consensus meeting, participants shortened the list to a 25 item checklist, by using evidence, whenever available. A prototype of a flow diagram provides information about the method of patient recruitment, the order of test execution, and the numbers of patients undergoing the test under evaluation and the reference standard, or both. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of research depends on complete and accurate reporting. If medical journals adopt the STARD checklist and flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve to the advantage of clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals, and the public.
This paper references
10.12968/JOWC.2004.13.3.26593
Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
A. Walker (2004)
10.1177/000456329102800602
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals
L. A. Colaianni (1988)
10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1
The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
P. Bossuyt (2003)
Use of methodological standards
MC Reid (1978)
10.1177/0272989X8700700209
Workup Bias in Prediction Research
R. Panzer (1987)
10.1001/JAMA.285.15.1996
Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials.
M. Egger (2001)
CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9
D Moher (1996)
CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials). Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials
M Egger (1996)
10.1097/00004424-199203000-00014
Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging.
D. Kent (1992)
Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications.
P. Griner (1981)
10.1201/9781420030679.ch5
Magnetic resonance imaging.
J. Hogg (1994)
10.1001/JAMA.1995.03530080061042
Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
M. Reid (1995)
Peripheral arterial disease: Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000;217:105–14
PJ Nelemans (2000)
10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80257-1
Summary receiver operating characteristic curves as a technique for meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in peripheral arterial disease.
S. de Vries (1996)
10.1373/49.1.7
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.
P. Bossuyt (2003)
10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2
Basic principles of ROC analysis.
C. Metz (1978)
10.1148/RADIOLOGY.217.1.R00OC11105
Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography.
P. Nelemans (2000)
10.1001/JAMA.282.11.1061
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
J. Lijmer (1999)
The selection of diagnostic tests
DL Sackett
10.1001/JAMA.285.15.1992
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.
D. Moher (2001)
10.1186/1471-2288-1-2
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
D. Moher (2001)
10.1177/0272989X8700700304
The Effects of Disease Verification and Referral on the Relationship Between Symptoms and Diseases
J. Knottnerus (1987)
; 283 : 1963 ]
C Begg
The efficacy of diagnostic
DG Fryback (1986)
Making 1991;11:88-94
DL Kent (1991)
The selection of diagnos
DL Sackett (1981)
randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2001;285:1996-9
JA Knottnerus (1996)
10.1001/JAMA.276.8.637
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
C. Begg (1996)
lection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures . Principles and applications
PF Griner (1981)
10.1002/SIM.4780060402
Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests.
C. Begg (1987)
10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70422-2
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
C. Begg (1996)
Summary receiver operating
SO Devries (2000)
10.1186/1471-2288-1-2
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
D. Moher (2001)
A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.
G. Guyatt (1986)



This paper is referenced by
10.1371/journal.pntd.0002290
Prospective Evaluation of Three Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Diagnosis of Human Leptospirosis
M. Goris (2013)
10.1186/1471-2490-13-42
Investigation of CCL18 and A1AT as potential urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer detection
M. Miyake (2013)
10.1002/bjs.9008
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C‐reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis
C-W Yu (2013)
10.1111/1471-0528.12172
Novel biomarkers for predicting intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
A. Conde-Agudelo (2013)
10.1371/journal.pone.0061826
A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale
L. Haddow (2013)
10.1136/emermed-2015-205197
A systematic review of stroke recognition instruments in hospital and prehospital settings
Matthew P Rudd (2015)
10.1080/17489530801927757
Considerations for appraising diagnostic studies of communication disorders
T. Klee (2008)
10.1097/01.BCR.0000216319.22391.87
How Relevant and Useful Is the Cochrane Library as a Resource for Evidence in Burn Care, Practice, and Management?
J. Wasiak (2006)
10.1186/s12890-016-0353-7
BreathDx – molecular analysis of exhaled breath as a diagnostic test for ventilator–associated pneumonia: protocol for a European multicentre observational study
Pouline M. P. van Oort (2017)
10.1111/jth.13994
Age‐adjusted D‐dimer cut‐off leads to more efficient diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a comparison of four assays
M. Farm (2018)
10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000075
Reliable EGFR mutation testing in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular lymph node fine-needle aspirates: a cohort study with diagnostic performance analysis
A. Awwad (2015)
10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01436.x
Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests
I. Scott (2008)
10.1148/RADIOL.2431051823
Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4--appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
S. Halligan (2007)
10.1186/1752-2897-2-4
MRI efficacy in diagnosing internal lesions of the knee: a retrospective analysis
V. Nikolaou (2008)
10.1186/1471-2466-14-72
Exhaled breath profiling for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome
L. Bos (2014)
10.1136/jech.2003.014829
Applying systematic review methods to studies of people’s views: an example from public health research
A. Harden (2004)
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020631
Validating malignant melanoma ICD-9-CM codes in Umbria, ASL Napoli 3 Sud and Friuli Venezia Giulia administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study
M. Orso (2018)
10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00418.x
Diagnosis and Quantitation of Intracranial Stenosis
E. Feldmann (2009)
Establishing the diagnostic accuracy of radiographer chest x-ray reports and their influence on clinicians’ clinical reasoning: A comparison with consultant radiologists
N. Woznitza (2018)
10.17863/CAM.16254
The impact of delirium on cognitive outcomes in population-based studies
D. Davis (2014)
10.5312/wjo.v8.i4.342
RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening
M. Friedrich (2017)
Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum
Y. Hazewinkel (2014)
10.5278/vbn.phd.med.00087
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer
Randi Fuglsang Fonager (2017)
10.1186/s12885-019-5698-x
Accuracy of analysis of cfDNA for detection of single nucleotide variants and copy number variants in breast cancer
X. Yang (2019)
Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation With 320-slice Computed Tomography
(2012)
10.1097/01.mcp.0000239542.32455.9f
Contemporary approach to the diagnosis of non-massive pulmonary embolism
G. Le Gal (2006)
10.23750/abm.v90i4.7479
CT-guided biopsy of subdiaphragmatic small renal nodule with the coaxial technique using MPR images
L. Saba (2019)
10.1111/aogs.13258
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the severity of abnormal invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
A. Familiari (2018)
Documents American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus the Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 Expert Consensus
D. Rubin (2010)
10.1186/s41073-017-0032-0
Mentored peer review of standardized manuscripts as a teaching tool for residents: a pilot randomized controlled multi-center study
V. Wong (2017)
10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0_9
Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
G. Schwarzer (2015)
10.13189/IJRH.2014.020502
A Critical Systematic Review of Studies Regarding Resilience in Turkey: A Call for the Socio-ecology of Resilience Perspective
G. Arat (2014)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar