Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Effect Of Varying CT Section Width On Volumetric Measurement Of Lung Tumors And Application Of Compensatory Equations.

H. Winer-Muram, S. Jennings, C. Meyer, Y. Liang, A. Aisen, R. Tarver, R. Mcgarry
Published 2003 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
PURPOSE To determine how volume measurements of simulated and clinical lung tumors at standard computed tomographic (CT) lung window and level settings vary with section width and to derive and apply compensatory equations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Spherical simulated tumors of varying diameters were imaged with varying CT section widths, the images were displayed on a workstation, the cross-sectional area of the tumor on each section was measured by using elliptical and perimeter methods, and the areas were integrated to compute tumor volume. The actual and measured tumor volumes for differing section widths and tumor diameters were compared, and compensatory equations were derived. The equations were applied to contemporaneous chest CT images obtained in patients with stage I lung cancer, and the difference between thick- and thin-section-derived volumes before and after application of the equations was determined. RESULTS All simulated tumor volumes were overestimated 11%-278%; overestimation varied directly with section width and inversely with tumor diameter. With both measurement methods, mean thin-section volumes of clinical tumors in 55 patients were significantly smaller (P <.01) than mean thick-section volumes: Mean elliptical measurements were 15,025 mm3 (thin) and 18,037 mm3 (thick), with a 20.0% difference; mean perimeter measurements were 16,164 mm3 (thin) and 20,718 mm3 (thick), with a 22.2% difference. The thin-section-to-thick-section volume difference was larger for the smallest tumors. Thin-section volumes were smaller than thick-section volumes in 53 patients with the elliptical method and in 51 patients with the perimeter method. Applying the equations decreased the difference between thick- and thin-section volumes in 37 (67%) of the 55 patients with the elliptical method and in 41 (74%) patients with the perimeter method. The mean thin-section-to-thick-section volume difference became nonsignificant with the perimeter method but remained significant with the elliptical method. CONCLUSION Measured lung tumor volumes vary significantly with varying CT section width; overestimation varies directly with section width and inversely with tumor size. Compensatory equations that are somewhat effective in reducing these effects can be derived.
This paper references
Factors influencing the accuracy of volume measurements in spiral CT: a phantom study.
L. Van Hoe (1997)
Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT--preliminary experience.
D. Yankelevitz (1999)
Two-dimensional multi-criterion segmentation of pulmonary nodules on helical CT images.
B. Zhao (1999)
Computed tomographic volumetric calculation reproducibility.
R. B. Staron (1986)
Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance of the Thorax.
D. Naidich (1991)
The influence of partial volume averaging on sphere detectability in computed tomography.
D. Plewes (1981)
The effect on apparent size of simulated pulmonary nodules of using three standard CT window settings.
K. M. Harris (1993)
Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements.
K. Hopper (1996)
The natural history of lung cancer: a review based on rates of tumour growth.
D. Geddes (1979)
Factors affecting the measurement of size and CT number in computed tomography.
B. Baxter (1981)
Accuracy of Volume Measurements of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms by Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Preliminary Clinical Application
D. Disler (1994)
Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: interobserver variation in assessment of lesion size
D. Wormanns (2000)
The effect of computed tomography viewer controls on anatomical measurements.
P. Koehler (1979)
Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning.
H. Winer-Muram (2002)
M. Tiitola (2001)
Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation.
D. Yankelevitz (2000)
Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT.
S. Diederich (1999)

This paper is referenced by
Distribution of renal tumor growth rates determined by using serial volumetric CT measurements.
J. Zhang (2009)
Volumetric Measurements of Lung Nodules with Multi-Detector Row CT: Effect of Changes in Lung Volume
J. Goo (2006)
A Multicenter Study of Volumetric Computed Tomography for Staging Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.
V. Rusch (2016)
Analysis of setup error based on CTVision for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during IGRT
Shuxu Zhang (2016)
Information-Theoretic Approach for Analyzing Bias and Variance in Lung Nodule Size Estimation With CT: A Phantom Study
M. Gavrielides (2010)
Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT.
S. Oda (2010)
Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
M. Gould (2013)
Assessment of tumor growth in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in von Hippel Lindau syndrome.
A. Weisbrod (2014)
Quantitative CT: technique dependence of volume estimation on pulmonary nodules.
B. Chen (2012)
Semi-automatic volumetric measurement of lung cancer using multi-detector CT effects of nodule characteristics.
S. Iwano (2009)
Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans
Jan-Martin Kuhnigk (2006)
The effect of lung volume on nodule size on CT.
I. Petkovska (2007)
Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).
M. Gould (2007)
Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT.
M. Gavrielides (2009)
Progression-Free Survival The Imaging Viewpoint: How Imaging Affects Determination of
Daniel C. Sullivan (2013)
The Imaging Viewpoint: How Imaging Affects Determination of Progression-Free Survival
D. Sullivan (2013)
Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements--a phantom study.
J. Ravenel (2008)
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines : ACCP * Nodules : When Is It Lung Cancer ? Evaluation of Patients With Pulmonary
D. Midthun (2007)
Volume-doubling time of pulmonary nodules with ground glass opacity at multidetector CT: Assessment with computer-aided three-dimensional volumetry.
S. Oda (2011)
Distribution of stage I lung cancer growth rates determined with serial volumetric CT measurements.
S. Jennings (2006)
Evaluation of a pig femoral head osteonecrosis model
P. Zhang (2010)
Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters.
O. Honda (2007)
Statistical image quantification toward optimal scan fusion and change quantification
Vaclav Potesil (2007)
University of Groningen Methods and validation of nodule measurement in a lung cancer screening
Ying (2010)
Linac-Based Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
Ruijiang Li (2011)
Usefulness of concurrent reading using thin-section and thick-section CT images in subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodules.
H. Lee (2009)
Sensitivity and accuracy of volumetry of pulmonary nodules on low-dose 16- and 64-row multi-detector CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study
X. Xie (2012)
Computer analysis of computed tomography scans of the lung: a survey
I. Sluimer (2006)
A Semi-automatic Solitary Pulmonary Nodule Volume Measurement Algorithm on Low-Dose CT Images
Guodong Zhang (2009)
A Practical Guide from the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) Regarding the Radiographic Assessment of Treatment Response of Thymic Epithelial Tumors Using Modified RECIST Criteria
M. Benveniste (2014)
Low-dose CT: technique, reading methods and image interpretation
C. Rampinelli (2013)
Prediction of growth rate of solid renal masses: utility of MR imaging features--preliminary experience.
Katerina Dodelzon (2012)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar