Online citations, reference lists, and bibliographies.
← Back to Search

Hepatic CT Enhancement. Part II. Alterations In Contrast Material Volume And Rate Of Injection Within The Same Patients.

T. Chambers, R. Baron, R. Lush
Published 1994 · Medicine

Cite This
Download PDF
Analyze on Scholarcy
Share
PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of alterations in contrast material volume and injection rate on liver computed tomographic (CT) enhancement within the same patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty patients underwent repeat CT within 6 months, one with 150 mL of nonionic contrast material at 2 mL/sec, the other with 150 mL (n = 8, group A), 100 mL (n = 14, group B), or 180 mL (n = 18, group C) at 3 mL/sec. Comparisons were made only within the same patients. RESULTS In group A, mean liver enhancement was greater with the higher rate (3 mL/sec) up to 130 seconds after injection, mean peak liver enhancement was greater by 10 HU, and mean time to peak enhancement was shorter by 15 seconds. In group B, mean peak enhancement was greater with 150 mL by 9 HU, and mean time to peak enhancement was longer by 27 seconds. In group C, peak enhancement and time to peak liver enhancement were greater. CONCLUSION Contrast material volume and injection rate have interdependent effects on liver enhancement and potentially tumor conspicuity. Higher rates compensate partially for lower volume, but enhancement is still reduced. The optimal window of time for imaging after injection varies with injection technique.



This paper is referenced by
10.1097/00004728-200201000-00004
Optimal Scan Delay in Spiral CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
I. Hartmann (2002)
10.1097/00004728-199607000-00025
Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of injection time on time to peak hepatic enhancement.
T. Irie (1996)
10.1148/RADIOLOGY.219.3.R01JN45699
Discrimination of small hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular malignant tumors smaller than 3 cm with three-phase helical CT.
T. Kim (2001)
10.1007/978-3-642-59450-2_20
Application of Multislice Computed Tomography in Liver and Pancreas
H. Ji (2001)
10.1148/RADIOLOGY.210.1.R99JA2197
Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
M. Tublin (1999)
10.2214/AJR.04.0923
Variation of the time to aortic enhancement of fixed-duration versus fixed-rate injection protocols.
M. Kim (2006)
10.1007/88-470-0363-6_3
Contrast Medium Administration and Scan Timing for MDCT
J. Heiken (2005)
CT-Angiographie: Unterschiede in der Bildgebung von Abdominalarterien mittels verschiedener Dünnschichtrekonstruktionen und Kontrastmittel- applikationsformen an einem 16-Zeilen-Multidetektor-CT
C. Claussen (2008)
10.1007/978-3-642-56976-0_27
Retroperitoneum and Ureters
L. Lemaitre (2000)
10.1007/s002619900189
Effect of portal venous flow augmentation on liver enhancement with CT
P. García (1997)
10.1259/0007-1285-68-815-1185
Quantitative perfusion parameters of focal nodular hyperplasia and normal liver parenchyma as determined by electron beam tomography.
R. Groell (1995)
10.1002/JMRI.1880060210
Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: Basic principles and clinical applications
Koenraad L. Verstraete (1996)
10.1016/S1089-2516(01)90019-8
Noninvasive imaging approach to patients with suspected hepatobiliary disease.
A. D. Levy (2001)
10.1097/00004728-200603000-00003
Optimal Delay Time for the Hepatic Parenchymal Enhancement at the Multidetector CT Examination
Y. Chung (2006)
10.2214/AJR.174.2.1740471
Contrast-Enhanced CT of Small Hypovascular Hepatic Tumors
B. Kuszyk (2000)
10.1007/s00330-003-2085-3
Improvement of parenchymal and vascular enhancement using saline flush and power injection for multiple-detector-row abdominal CT
H. Schoellnast (2003)
10.1007/s002619900572
Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model
P. García (2014)
10.1016/B978-1-4160-2332-6.50074-9
Computed Tomography of the Solid Abdominal Organs
F. L. Hoff (2008)
10.1515/pjmpe-2017-0008
Optimization of image quality in pulmonary CT angiography with low dose of contrast material
Abed Al Nasser Assi (2017)
10.1007/978-3-642-59814-2_7
Clinical Doses of Contrast Media
R. Older (1999)
10.2214/AJR.176.2.1760447
Power injection of contrast media using central venous catheters: feasibility, safety, and efficacy.
B. Herts (2001)
10.1007/s00261-003-0022-1
Comparison of different injection forms in CT examination of the upper abdomen
L. Martí-Bonmatí (2003)
10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00217-1
Clinical evaluation of a computer simulated prediction model of contrast enhancement of the liver in spiral CT.
W. Schöber (2004)
10.1007/978-88-470-0832-8_2
Principles of Contrast Medium Delivery and Scan Timing in MDCT
K. T. Bae (2008)
Helical computed tomography of the abdomen: evaluation of image quality using 1.0, 1.3, and 1.5 pitches.
Y. Lin (2002)
10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70020-8
CT scan of the liver.
S. R. Kemmerer (1998)
10.2214/AJR.173.5.10541087
Cirrhotic liver enhancement on dual-phase helical CT: comparison with noncirrhotic livers in 146 patients.
O. Vignaux (1999)
10.18452/13773
Spiral-CT zur Diagnostik fokaler Leberläsionen
L. Kopka (2001)
10.1097/00004424-199912000-00004
Effective contrast use in CT angiography and dual-phase hepatic CT performed with a subsecond scanner.
W. Luboldt (1999)
10.1097/00004424-200008000-00005
Timing of the hepatic arterial phase during contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the liver: assessment of normal values in 25 volunteers.
T. Bader (2000)
10.1007/s00261-001-0095-7
Hepatofugal portal flow in advanced liver cirrhosis with spontaneous portosystemic shunts: effects on parenchymal hepatic enhancement at dual-phase helical CT
O. Vignaux (2001)
10.1148/RADIOL.2272012033
Hepatic arteries in potential donors for living related liver transplantation: evaluation with multi-detector row CT angiography.
S. Lee (2003)
See more
Semantic Scholar Logo Some data provided by SemanticScholar