← Back to Search
Evaluating Two Brief Substance-use Interventions For Mandated College Students.
H. White, T. J. Morgan, Lisa A Pugh, Katarzyna Celinska, E. Labouvie, R. Pandina
Published 2006 · Medicine
Download PDFAnalyze on Scholarcy
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated two brief personal feedback substance-use interventions for students mandated to the Rutgers University Alcohol and Other Drug Assistance Program for Students (ADAPS): (1) a brief motivational interview (BMI) intervention and (2) a written feedback-only (WF) intervention. A key question addressed by this study was whether there is a need for face-to-face feedback in the context of motivational interviewing to affect changes in substance-use behaviors or whether a written personal feedback profile is enough of an intervention to motivate students to change their substance use. METHOD The sample consisted of 222 students who were mandated to ADAPS, were eligible for the study, and completed the 3-month follow-up assessment. Eligible students completed a baseline assessment from which a personal feedback profile was created. They were then randomly assigned to the BMI or WF condition. Students were followed 3 months later. RESULTS Students in both interventions reduced their alcohol consumption, prevalence of cigarette and marijuana use, and problems related to alcohol and drug use between baseline and follow-up. There were no differences between the two intervention conditions in terms of any substance-use outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that, under these circumstances and with these students, assessment and WF students changed similarly to those who had an assessment and WF within the context of a BMI. Given the fact that the former is less costly in terms of time and personnel, written profiles may be found to be a cost-effective means of reducing alcohol and drug use and related problems among low- to moderate-risk mandated college students. More research is needed with mandated students to determine the efficacy of feedback interventions and to isolate the effects of interventions from the effects of being caught and being reprimanded to treatment.
This paper references
Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.
B. Borsari (2005)
Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.
B. Borsari (2000)
Surveying the damage: a review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations.
H. W. Perkins (2002)
My Student Body: A High-Risk Drinking Prevention Web Site for College Students
Emil Chiauzzi (2005)
Randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive-behavioural interventions among regular users of amphetamine.
A. Baker (2001)
Social and Psychological Influences on Emerging Adult Drinking Behavior
H. White (2004)
Self-report among injecting drug users: a review.
S. Darke (1998)
Harm reduction for alcohol problems: Moving beyond the controlled drinking controversy *
G. Marlatt (1993)
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.
H. White (1989)
Mandatory alcohol intervention for alcohol-abusing college students: a systematic review.
N. Barnett (2005)
Getting drunk and growing up: trajectories of frequent binge drinking during the transition to young adulthood.
J. Schulenberg (1996)
The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial.
J. Mccambridge (2004)
Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.
K. Fromme (2004)
Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change, 2nd ed.
W. Miller (2002)
Smoking, Drinking, and Drug Use in Young Adulthood: The Impacts of New Freedoms and New Responsibilities
J. Bachman (1997)
Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.
G. Marlatt (1998)
Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and short Form C: forensic norms.
P. Andrews (2003)
Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?
S. Walters (2005)
A developmental perspective on alcohol use and heavy drinking during adolescence and the transition to young adulthood.
J. Schulenberg (2002)
Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale
W. Reynolds (1982)
Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change.
W. R. Miller (2002)
College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study
H. Wechsler (2000)
Brief alcohol interventions with mandated or adjudicated college students.
N. Barnett (2004)
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
D. Crowne (1960)
Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students.
M. Larimer (2002)
Adding voucher-based incentives to coping skills and motivational enhancement improves outcomes during treatment for marijuana dependence.
A. Budney (2000)
Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention.
C. Neighbors (2004)
Potential Contributions of the Life Span Developmental Approach to the Study of Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Use: The Rutgers Health and Human Development Project, a Working Model
R. Pandina (1984)
Alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students.
J. Knight (2002)
Reducing Alcohol Use in College Students: A Controlled Trial of Two Brief Interventions
S. Walters (2000)
Motivational interviewing: a review
E. Britt (2003)
The Relationship between Work-Specific and Generalized Stress and Alcohol and Marijuana Use among Recent Entrants to the Labor Force
V. Johnson (1995)
Brief Intervention in College Settings
M. Larimer (2004)
Using Brief Opportunities for Change in Medical Settings
N. Heather (1998)
Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history.
J. Baer (2001)
The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review.
C. Dunn (2001)
Episodic heavy drinking among college students: Methodological issues and longitudinal perspectives.
K. Weingardt (1998)
Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.
S. Collins (2002)
A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.
J. Murphy (2004)
Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A Harm Reduction Approach
L. Dimeff (1999)
Trends in College Binge Drinking During a Period of Increased Prevention Efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001
H. Wechsler (2002)
Motivational interviewing for alcohol-involved adolescents in the emergency room.
N. Barnett (2001)
Validating a Five-Factor Marijuana Motives Measure: Relations with Use, Problems, and Alcohol Motives.
Jeffrey S. Simons (1998)
Effects of Normative Feedback on Consumption among Heavy Drinking College Students
G. Agostinelli (1995)
Motivational interviewing with personalized feedback: a brief intervention for motivating smokers with schizophrenia to seek treatment for tobacco dependence.
M. Steinberg (2004)
Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24.
R. Hingson (2002)
Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use.
R. Stephens (2000)
The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Brian L. Burke (2003)
Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory.
A. Beck (1984)
The Developmental Context of Substance use in Emerging Adulthood
J. Arnett (2005)
Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.
J. Murphy (2001)
This paper is referenced by
Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature
R. Kessler (2007)
Providing Web-Based Feedback and Social Norms Information to Reduce Student Alcohol Intake: A Multisite Investigation
B. Bewick (2010)
Screening and Brief Intervention for Hazardous Alcohol Use: A Pilot Study in a College Counseling Center
Danielle L Terry (2012)
Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.
M. Larimer (2007)
Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention.
H. White (2007)
Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.
M. Larimer (2007)
Correlates of AUDIT Risk Status for Male and Female College Students
Kelly S DeMartini (2009)
Trial of the university assistance program for alcohol use among mandated students.
H. Amaro (2009)
Cannabinoid Modulation of Emotion, Memory, and Motivation
P. Campolongo (2015)
Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.
K. Carey (2009)
Chapter 20 – Alcohol use among undergraduate students: From brief interventions to behavioral economics
Amber M. Henslee (2007)
“No-Contact” Interventions for Unhealthy College Drinking
Rebecca N Zisserson (2007)
The E ectiveness of a Web-Based Personalized Feedback and Social Norms Alcohol Intervention on United Kingdom University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial
B. Bewick (2017)
A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students.
R. Turrisi (2009)
Concurrent Polysubstance Use in College Students: A Brief Social Norms Intervention to Abate Use
Jennifer L Hernandez-Meier (2016)
Motivational Interviewing in Health Care: Helping Patients Change Behavior
S. Rollnick (2007)
Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.
N. Barnett (2007)
Reduction of alcohol-related harm on United States college campuses: The use of personal feedback interventions
H. White (2006)
Effectiveness of the Brief Alcohol and Screening Intervention for College Students (BASICS) Program With a Mandated Population
Gloria T. DiFulvio (2012)
Family history of alcohol abuse moderates effectiveness of a group motivational enhancement intervention in college women.
J. Labrie (2009)
Screening and Brief Intervention for Unhealthy Drug Use in Primary Care Settings: Randomized Clinical Trials Are Needed
R. Saitz (2010)
Sustain talk predicts poorer outcomes among mandated college student drinkers receiving a brief motivational intervention.
T. Apodaca (2014)
Psychophysiological reactivity to emotional picture cues two years after college students were mandated for alcohol interventions.
J. Buckman (2010)
A brief, web-based personalized feedback selective intervention for college student marijuana use: a randomized clinical trial.
C. Lee (2010)
Indicated prevention for college student marijuana use: a randomized controlled trial.
C. M. Lee (2013)
An Investigation of Existential and Positive Psychological Resources in College Students
Ian M LeSueur (2019)
Assessment of health risk behaviours among university students: a cross-sectional study in Lebanon
P. Salameh (2014)
Tell me... why do you drink? : a study of drinking motives in adolescence
E. Kuntsche (2007)
Development and evaluation of a smartphone app to reduce excessive alcohol consumption : self-regulatory factors
D. Crane (2017)
Protective Behavioral Strategies and Their Relationship With Negative Alcohol Consequences Among College Athletes
Jeremy J. Noble (2013)
RELATING CLIENT CHANGE LANGUAGE AND SAFER-SEX OUTCOMES IN A GROUP-DELIVERED MOTIVATIONAL ENHANCEMENT THERAPY (GMET) INTERVENTION FOR DETAINED ADOLESCENTS
Lisa H Glynn (2014)
Effectiveness of a Feedback-Based Brief Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Use in Community Substance Use Disorders Treatment
Blaise L. Worden (2013)See more